First, I use the term "Jesus
movies" kinda loosely cause some of my choices might not be your
typical movies about Jesus. Right now they're all pretty traditional,
but that could change. Godspell
has its own page. That's not to say I
like the following necessarily more or less than Godspell, it just has
its own page cause I had a lot more to say about it (and a lot more
time when I was watching that all the time). I don't really know much
about movies and technical stuff but here's my opinion, anyway... Also,
while this page was once supposed to be critical reviews of these
movies, it's turned more into a way in which I hope to be able to keep
all these movies separate. So just because a movie is here does not
necessarily mean I like it nor does a short description mean I disliked
it. I wrote just enough to keep things straight in my mind. Also, I
added a sort of awards section. This, again, is just a means for me to
remember what happened and what I particularly liked from each movie.
This is the movie CBS played
in
May of 2000. Three hours long and if not my favorite version then very
close (I say that every time I see a new version.) I know some points
were considered kinda controversial but I can't say I was shocked by
anything. I just really liked seeing Jesus dancing, having fun,
*smiling*. (Smiling is a big thing with me.) I also liked how Pilate
was portrayed. Why does he always come off so pitiable? How do we know
he didn't know what he was doing? In this movie, he is portrayed as the
true villain and at least one scene is taken from a historical source
outside the Bible, it demonstrates what Pilate actually did. In short,
the supporting cast of Armin- Mueller Stahl, Jacqueline Bisset, Debra
Messing and others is wonderful. Jeremy Sisto as Jesus depicts every
emotion from delight to sorrow to empathy beautifully. (Disclaimer: Mr.
Sisto is one of my favorite actors so I can hardly be expected to give
an unbiased opinion. Still, I thought his was a very human Jesus, with
out downplaying the divine aspects.)
This was a movie about a man
who
truly loved life and people. My one complaint? CBS didn't show the
original ending! Apparently, Jesus in jeans was too much for them. But
if we're gonna see Satan running around in modern suits to show that
he's ever present shouldn't Jesus, too? This starts with Jesus already
around 30 and shows his previous years via short flashbacks only. Keep
an eye out for some foreshadowing.
This was my favorite for a
while,
too. Christian Bale (Jesus) is one of my two favorite actors (Colin
Firth being the other one, just FYI). Favoritism aside this had its
good points. It was nice to see the story through the eyes of one who
was there when Jesus took both His first and last breathes. Pernilla
August portrays Mary and does an excellent job, in my opinion.
Unfortunately, this also had some drawbacks. Since the movie is through
Mary's eyes we don't get a lot of the usual Jesus movies' staples
(Gethsemane, the Last Supper). Also, if you're like me and prefer a
Jesus who seems happy then you are forewarned, Bale manages to smile
only around 4 times. That aside I'd still recommend the movie. When we
see Mary's grief at losing her own son, the child she raised, we are
reminded of how much love it took for God to sacrifice His Son for us.
This also does a good job of depicting Jesus' life from birth 'til
death. It also has really good attention to detail in what props they
use. (What I mean by this is meaningful objects used early on reappear
later in the movie so naturally your mind wonders to the first time you
saw the object and the juxtaposition of the two scenes is often
emotional.)
This one once topped my list
of
favorite movies. What a surprise! Time's gone by since then and I still
love it. However, I've gone a little bit more in the realist direction
since I first saw this. It has served as a really good way for
remembering verses from the Gospel. Story-wise this is fairly late in
Jesus' preaching career and He seems a bit cynical. Of course, later
when I saw it performed live with Ted Neely starring again it didn't
seem that way so much, who knows. In any case, it managed to attract
its fair share of controversy. Maybe being born at the time I was I
just don't grasp it as much because I've been watching this since I was
a kid. In any case, I love this music. It just never quite leaves you.
("Superstar" is running through my head right now and it's been months
since I last heard it!) It's definitely a different way of looking at
the story! I guess you would expect that from a rock opera about Jesus
that seems to be through the eyes of Judas Iscariot. It also features a
highly pitiable Pontius Pilate. However, if at all possible, I'd
recommend seeing a live production. While the scenery is fantastic
here, nothing beats seeing it live. I'm not even talking about a big
touring production. I saw it at a small, local theatre and was
extremely moved.
I guess this was ABC's answer
to
"Jesus" and "Mary, Mother of Jesus". And it was a good answer. This
time we see the story unfold through the eyes of a young girl, Jairus'
dying daughter. Generally, I'm not a claymation fan but this story can
succeed almost anywhere. Actually, it's not entirely claymation.
Flashbacks, parables, and dreams are depicted in animation. It's pretty
amazing how complete this seems even though it only lasts 1.5 hours.
Also amazing is the voice of Jesus (Ralph Fiennes). It amazes me that
the same voice that drives such horror into a person ("Schindler's
List") can be the voice of Jesus. This is probably one of the best
versions for kids. If you really enjoy this and have a DVD player, I'd
suggest getting the DVD. It has a documentary on how they made it that
was completely amazing. It seems to have been painstakingly and
lovingly done.
The Life of Jesus:
The
Revolutionary
I'd never seen this before
but it
was on sale so I figured why not? I didn't really expect much but
surprisingly this version was very good. At not quite two hours it
covered more parables and healings than any of the others. The one
thing I was a bit confused by was the organization of the scenes. The
DVD was split into two programs. Side 1 seemed more concerned with the
teachings of Jesus and Side 2 the miracles. Side 1 had a crucifixion
scene and Side 2 the trial and a crucifixion lasting maybe 1 minute. As
to why they didn't put the two together for just one movie I have no
idea. All I can guess was that Side 2 was supposed to be geared towards
younger audiences. This rivals "Jesus" as most representative of how I
view Jesus' personality. It also has some haunting foreshadowing. (Yes,
I love foreshadowing.) Watch what game Jesus plays with the children.
While not depicted on screen it reminds one of a later "game". John Kay
Steel as Jesus does an excellent job and proves a very dramatic
storyteller.
Jesus Christ
Superstar (2000)
This was certainly a
surprise! I'm
used to waiting months from the time I first see a preview to the
actual airing of the movie. Here I saw a preview for JCS before "Meet
the Parents" (I had no idea they were making this version) and two
weeks later I was sitting down to watch it for the first time! Of all
the movies on this page I prolly started this one with the most
trepidation. For one I still liked the old version and for another I'd
heard the old one called "the Disneyfied version" in comparison to this
one and I already thought the 1973 version was dark!
Apparently the idea behind
this
one was how would we react if Jesus came today? The answer? The same as
our ancestors 2000 years ago. Well, except for some added paparazzi,
cargo pants, and machine guns.
I guess the best way to
explain
this one is how it rates compared to the 1973 version. I still like the
singing better in the original but found this version's acting to be
more realistic. Granted, some of the facial expressions are
over-emphasized (these are mostly stage actors). The changes in Judas'
(Jerome Pradon) character I was especially impressed with. He comes off
as being the one who most loved Jesus and even most recognized His true
message (which didn't entail going after the Romans, heavily armed).
But he's not made to look like a trapped saint either (witness his
interaction with Mary). I felt the interaction between Jesus and Judas
in this version was more meaningful and touching.
Now as for Jesus (Glenn
Carter)...
I've read several opinions of the movie and Carter seems to be most
criticized. I'd definitely disagree. In this version I found Jesus to
be far more personable (His interaction with the lepers is a lot more
patient and loving than in the 1973 version.) He also seems a lot more
vulnerable to some of our more unwelcome states (tiredness, distress,
loneliness, etc.) I suppose that's either a plus or negative, depending
on your viewpoint, but I thought it stressed how dear His sacrifice was.
In any case this version is
like
its predecessor in that it is most definitely not your typical Jesus
movie!
This telling of Jesus' story
comes
from the Roman tribune who crucified Jesus and won His robe. The
tribune, Marcellius, is sent from Rome to Jerusalem and arrives, with
his slaves, in Jerusalem on Palm Sunday. He is briefed on the story of
"the Fanatic". His newly acquired Greek slave, Demetrius, makes eye
contact with Jesus and knows there's something to this claim of His
Messiahship. Demetrius learns of the plot against Jesus and goes to
warn Him. Unfortunately, he arrives too late and the next time he sees
Jesus is on the path to Golgotha. When Marcellius wins Jesus' robe,
Demetrius honors it for what it is, the robe of God. Marcellius demands
Demetrius give him the robe to cover himself when the heavy rains start
after Jesus' death. The minute Marcellius touches the robe he cries in
pain and Demetrius grabs it back, cursing Marcellius for killing Jesus
and running away.
Marcellius returns to Rome
and is
unable to go on with his duties because he believes the robe bewitched
him for he finds himself unable to remember Good Friday with out losing
his mind. Therefore, he is sent back to Jerusalem by the Caesar to find
this cursed robe and destroy it. Along the way Marcellius finds himself
in Cana, a small Christian community. He grows to love its people but
harbors the awful secret that he killed their Lord. He also finds
Demetrius and learns that the robe has no power, only his guilt does.
Simon Peter visits the village and tells Marcellius his own story of
denying Jesus and teaches him that Jesus' cry "God forgive them." was
meant for all of them. He joins Peter and Demetrius in their mission
and finds himself back in Rome where he faces the ultimate test: Deny
his new faith and live or die as a martyr.
I thought this was a really
interesting movie. I'd expected the typical staples of miracles,
parables, the Last Supper and the rest. This movie only showed Jesus
twice (and never His face) and He only had two lines. Obviously it had
some historical inaccuracies but if you can get past that there's some
excellent teachings like what does it mean to be healed and the beauty
of giving and the power of God's forgiveness.
This is not the same as the
CBS
version. The version is a lot more "by the Book", in fact it tells the
story as related in the Gospel of Luke. Jesus was well portrayed,
smiling and laughing, sad and angry. There was also some foreshadowing
(!). Prolly what struck me most was how idyllic and peaceful the many
scenes of Jesus and His disciples walking around were. They just
generally looked like a group you'd want to hang around with. Unlike
the other versions this one also had a narrator which was kinda
interesting. It also had a bunch of scenes that I'd never seen in any
other movies like the near-assassination of Jesus in Nazareth, the
angel's appearance in Gethsemane, Simeon's blessing on baby Jesus.
Those scenes were interesting to see.
It did an excellent job of
depicting Luke but I really missed the other Gospels. Gone was Lazarus,
no wine into water, etc. But naturally when you make a movie you have
to make choices about what to keep and what to take out so that's okay.
It was really hard to not have Mary at the Crucifixion, though. The
Crucifixion itself was very reverent but it seemed to be missing
something. It just didn't have the impact the others generally do. It
almost looked too easy. The Resurrection scenes seemed more complete
than usual, however. In general, I liked it mostly because it featured
events often ignored by the other movies.
What do you get when you take
a
beloved book, Patrick Swayze's traitor-friend from "Ghost", Salieri
from "Amadeus" and put them together? It's the movie version of Fr.
Joseph Girzone's book "Joshua", which became an entire series. If
you're hoping for a very by-the-book dramatization, this is not for
you. The Jewish characters that were plentiful in the book have been
narrowed down to one guy. Large sections of the book are skipped, new
parts are added, and all flashbacks have been excised. However, I think
the spirit of the book remains intact. Joshua still stands up against
the church heirarchy. He stills changes the lives of the citizens of
Auburn and, naturally, does the whole carpenter gig.
Some of it's corny, some of
the
minor characters aren't exactly Oscar-caliber performers but it's a
good film. I was concerned when I heard Tony Goldwyn (Carl from "Ghost"
and Creepy Rapist Guy from "Kiss the Girls") would be playing Joshua
but it works. He comes off as really sincere, really human, and by the
end of the movie really something beyond human. F. Murray Abraham is
interesting as Fr. Tardone. He reminds me of way too many actual
priests... It's a good performance that could have easily turned
cartoonish but is kept real.
Okay, in short, "The Cotton
Patch
Gospel" seems to be "Godspell" gone South. Not that I have any real
reason to believe "Godspell" was composed and/or conceived in the North
but I tend to associate it with Broadway and Canada so... They're both
really minimalistic as far as props and scenery. CPG takes it one step
further making it a one-man show plus a four man chorus. The story is
basically what if Jesus had been born in modern Georgia instead of
Israel 2000 years ago?
Jesus is born to Mary and
Joseph
Davidson (haha) on their way to an IRS tax audit. He's born in an
abondoned trailer. Three scholars visit leaving him a Gold Mastercard,
peach scented candles, and a fancy bottle of cologne. Word gets to
Governor Herod who has a bomb thrown into a nursery, hoping to kill the
baby. By this time Joseph and Family have fled to Mexico. The show then
follows the family on their trip to Georgia with young Jesus, his
departure to start his ministry, and finally his lynching and
resurrection.
Awards
This gets the Best Massacre
of the
Infants scene. A macabre award, for sure. You don't actually see
anything since this is just a stage with five guys on it. But the
Narrator (who turns out to be Matthew but who plays everyone) talks
about the doctor explaining to women that their children died and Harry
Chapin wrote two really good pieces of music that are sung against each
other. One is "I Did It" sung by Herod and Crew which talks about the
dirty deeds carried out in the name of political glory. At the same
time a lone guy sings "Mama is Here", a lullabye. It was really
poignant for a scene that is often glossed over in other
interpretations.
The next "award" is the Best
Wine
into Water scene. The story is Jesus is at a wedding where the bride is
the daughter of a man who supports Joseph's carpentry shop. The run out
of wine Joseph suggests that Jesus might... get some. So Jesus goes off
alone and asks his Daddy to help. It was cool that he used Daddy in
this one cause Abba is usually translated into "father" but most
everything I read said it was a more familiar term like "daddy" or
"papa". He tries snapping his fingers, he tries concentrating really
hard, he tries doing a jig in front of it, finally he relaxes and gives
up and... it changes. It was just cool to see Jesus' own surprise at
his abilities. Generally he seems really cool and collected in other
depictions of this scene.
Okay, next was the Best
Raising of
Jairus' Daughter Scene. I might actually have to check on that one,
though. "The Miracle Maker" is the story told through the eyes of
Jairus' daughter so you'd think that might be better. Then again, since
I don't remember that scene maybe not... Anyhow, Jairus informed Jesus
he was returning to his home and was going to bring his four year old
back to life. He was very definite. So Jesus went into where the girl
was lying and started to sing "Love the Lord, your God, with all your
heart, soul, and mind. Love your neighbor as you love yourself." Jesus
sang the first part and then you heard this smaller voice join in, the
little girl (although it was actually a grown guy). The whole time the
camera was positioned so that you were seeing what the girl would have
seen. It was a really beautiful scene.
Then there was what I think
was
one of the best depictions of the first prediction of the Passion. I
have a vague feeling there's another movie that I also think does a
great job here but I can't recall right now. Anyhow, Jesus announces
they will be going to Atlanta for a Bible Convention thing. Where he
will be lynched. The song "Going to Atlanta" is part the disciples
celebrating with a loud, happy song with a much quieter, sad Jesus
singing "What does Atlanta mean to me?" The two parts just really added
potency. That was the end of the first act.
My first favorite part in the
second act was the song "You are Still My Boy" sung by Mary and Joseph
after Jesus has turned away from his hometown which has rejected him.
It's just a really sad and beautiful song. Probably my second favorite
Jesus Returns Home scene. It's edged out only slightly by "The Greatest
Story Ever Told". What I liked about the CPG version was that it dealt
head on with Jesus' apparent abondonment of his family but with out
either party looking bad.
And there was the best Who Do
You
Say I Am? scene. Peter struggles with the answer. Doesn't know...
doesn't know... keeps repeating it and then has a moment of clarity and
says "You are the Son of God!" and Jesus answers "You are beautiful!"
It was funny and sweet at the same time.
The betrayal scene was very
sad. I
thought all the "villains" were well characterized. Judd aka Judas was
pathetic with out being totally acceptable. Pilate originally appeared
to be nice, as proven by the song title "Thank God for Governor
Pilate". That was another instance of great government-related irony as
happened with "I Did It". Pilate chooses to send Jesus to a prison,
just until things quiet down and he can get a fair trial. This makes
everyone happy. The chorus sings about all the great things Pilate does
while, secretly, Pilate is making a call to his uncle. He gives him the
exact route Jesus' transportation...
Matthew explains what
happened on
Friday, when they got the news of what happened. Thursday night the
tires of the truck had been shot out. Jesus was being transported by
only 2 guards. They were easily over-powered by several members of the
Klan. He was whipped 39 times and lynched.
But this movie had a
Resurrection,
unlike the "Godspell" movie. That was really cool. I mean there weren't
any special effects or anything. It was just really well-written. Then
they ended with Harry Chapin's "I Wonder What Would Happen to This
World" and a medley. I was kinda worried when I first popped in the
tape. I'm not a country music fan. And I'm really not a bluegrass fan.
But maybe I've been converted... The songs are all ready getting stuck!
Traditional story line,
only an
hour long so some things were dropped, obviously. Johnny Cash narrates
the whole thing and had the only speaking role save his wife, June
Carter Cash, who was Mary M. So instead of Jesus saying "I am the Way",
Cash would say something like "And Jesus said many beautiful things
like 'I am the Way'". At first this was kinda boring but I got the
point later. I think maybe he was trying to maintain the fact that
Jesus did not speak English. This become clearer during the "Cast the
first stone" scene. During the part when Jesus is writing in the sand,
he was writing in either Hebrew or Aramaic.
While the movie was only an
hour
long but it didn't really feel like any *major* events were sacrificed
for time, any more so than other movies. It probably would not be a
good movie for people trying to get an in-depth understanding of the
Gospels, though. The highlights of his teachings were covered but there
weren't actual teaching scenes. There were a couple interesting "crowd
scenes". During Palm Sunday and the Way of the Cross you could hear
crowds but only see Jesus wandering down abondoned roads.I'm not sure
what to make of that. Maybe it was trying to say that mentally Jesus
had to walk those roads alone. I don't know, it was just kinda jarring
to first see when you're so used to huge crowds.
I did like that the movie
respected Jesus' culture and religion. Cash outrights states that
"Jesus was born a Jew." That seems like a stupid thing for me to harp
on but it is true and too often forgotten, IMO. If everyone really
seriously thought about that then maybe anti-Semitism would die out, or
at least take a major hit.
The music was pretty good, I
don't
particularly like the style but that considered there were some
down-right catchy tunes.
Awards
First, best use of flashbacks
in a
Jesus movie. This was particularly effective twice. First, when Jesus
was playing with kids and there's a flash of Jesus as a little boy.
Second, when Jesus was being crucified and again their was the flash of
him as a boy and another of him as a man, a nonbeat-up man. Flashbacks
always make me cry...
Second, this wins for
grooviest
camera work. Triple takes, changes in perspective, etc.
Third, best scene of Jesus
making
sandcastles. Okay, well, maybe the only scene of Jesus making
sandcastles but that makes it cool. It was during the scene of Jesus
and the children. I liked that a whole segment was devoted to that
aspect instead of a brief "Oh look! Jesus is holding a baby, aww!!"
Fourth, best scene of guy
getting
his sight back. I just really liked the song Johnny Cash was singing
during that part.
The Passion of
the Christ
I guess it only makes sense I
should pipe up with my take on this much-talked-about movie. So here
goes...
I liked it. Didn't love it.
Didn't
come out feeling like I'd just had a life-altering experience. It was
what it was. Which is a movie. As for the violence... crucifixion is
violent. It was bloody, it was disgusting, it was degrading, it was
painful. I went into the movie expecting that, having read several
articles looking at crucifixion from social, anatomical, and faith
perspectives. So I was not shocked. As for charges of anti-Semitism, I
can see where that comes from. I do think it was a poor decision to
have the Temple destroyed. However, I can't say I think it was any more
anti-Semitic than you could say JCS is. At least in this version Gibson
depicts a high priest protesting the treatment of Jesus. JCS doesn't
even have that. I think it's a case of seeing what you want to see. I
believe anti-Semitism is a sin so this movie did not cause any of those
feelings in myself. If others did take that away from the movie I think
that's very, very sad.
I thought the movie was
beautifully acted. Though, gotta say I was most captivated by the
actress playing Mary of Nazareth (Maia Morgenstern). I only cried once
during the movie and that was during the scene where Jesus falls and
she flashes back to him falling as a boy. And her eyes as she held his
dead body are haunting. This is not to say I thought Jim Caviezel
wasn't great. He definitely was. I give credit to anyone who takes on
such a physically demanding role and learns a dead language! But what I
tend to focus on with movies is what sets them apart. And I think what
we got here is a very real Mary which isn't all that common, I don't
think.
I do think the demonic stuff
was a
lil... Stephen King TV movie-ish. No one I know has yet to
statisfactorily answer for themselves what the heck Satan was doing
holding a demonic baby. It seemed random and, I thought, distracting.
As for Satan, I thought that character was very well done. Very creepy
but also more "natural" looking than the demons. I guess one would hope
an actual actress would look more natural than animatronics or computer
animation or whatever the heck the demons were. :-)
There was one point that I'm
still
unsure of what I think. That's the role of women. The women in this
movie almost seemed to be magical. Which I'd like to think women are,
personally. Mary knowing where Jesus was. Pilate's wife gliding in to
comfort the two Marys. Veronica gliding in... But there was something
about it that didn't quite strike me as right... Maybe it's just that
with Jesus incapacitated for much of the movie, the women were really
the only positive characters. And that's more than a lil scary to think
about. Anyway, it's been a month since I've seen this movie and will
maybe revisit this if I ever see it again. So now, the awards:
Awards
First, best use of psychic
connection. While the other "magical women" elements may have bugged
me, Mary sensing Jesus' presence in the cell beneath her really got me.
I loved that.
Second, best use of
flashbacks
*sometimes.* I was really moved by the one of Jesus as a lil boy, as
mentioned before. Others I thought were more distracting and seemed
randomly placed but that was really good. I also liked the flashbacks
to Jesus meeting Mary Magdalene.
Third, best attempt at
linguistic
accuracy. Whatever else may have been wrong, I gotta give Mel Gibson
credit for putting a lot of the movie into Aramaic! Yikes! The whole
Greek-Latin confusion I'm not sure about so I'll let that slide. That
being said, I wish he'd extended that accuracy to hiring actors that
looked more appropriate. But it was well-acted and I suppose we can
only ask for so much realism from Hollywood.
Wow... What can I say? I'm
sure
there was a lot of love that went into this and I'm sure they were
really trying to do something moving and interesting. But I started to
get curious the minute they started showing promos for this. The only
movie told from Judas' perspective? Definitely not true. "Jesus Christ
Superstar" anyone? Or there was a slightly older Judas movie that aired
on Pax. But promotion problems aside...
I thought the guy playing
Judas
was pretty good. And I wish he'd played Jesus. Or that someone else
had! No offense to that actor but... Good gosh! In my opinion, it's
never a good sign when you're watching a Jesus movie and feel the need
to "Awww, poor baby!" Jesus repeatedly. Jesus was a leader. And
apparently a pretty strong one to have inspired so many people to the
point they would later die for him. But this guy... I'm not sure I'd
feel confident following him to the grocery store. He completely lacked
confidence! And apparently the followers he drew to him were much the
same. St. Andrew... Good gosh. I wanted to sit that guy down with a
blankie and some cookies and milk.
I was just... dumb-founded.
Anyway, in an interesting note: I think some of these sets were from
the 2000 Jesus movie. I'd heard this movie had used sets from a
previous Bible movie and I'm thinking it was definitely that one. In a
way, that made the movie even worse. I mean the 2000 version may not be
the most accurate or greatest thing out there but this movie did not
benefit from the comparison.
Awards
Best Jesus movie to watch if
you
just want to go "Ummm, what the heck?" repeatedly.
Before I get into this I'm
gonna
clear up a couple misconceptions I had about this that others may
also. First, the press seemed to suggest this was Jesus' story as
if he'd been born today. I didn't find that to be true.
Cause last I checked there wasn't a worldwide government and New York
was not a police state. I think the point *may* have been that
the world might have come to that with out Jesus' influence 2000 years
ago. I guess when I heard the phrase "If he came today..." I
envisioned a story with a more realistic setting. This came off
as futuristic which was fine. I'm just saying the press I
read/saw didn't give that impression. Second, I always thought a
rock opera (which is what "!Hero" is called) consisted of only sung
dialogue. Like Andrew Lloyd Webber's "JCS", "Evita", and
"Joseph". "!Hero" has lots of spoken dialogue. Which,
again, I had no problem with. It's just didn't fit my definition
of a rock opera which, I admit, may be totally incorrect.
Anyhow, now that that's done
the
basic plot is thus: a child is born to Mary in Bethlehem,
Pennsylvania. She names the boy Hero (and Jesus, I didn't
entirely follow whether Hero was his nickname or his name was Jesus
Hero or something). Hero grows up and at some point moves to New
York City. It's there he begins to spread the message of God's
love. He first tells Petrov and Judd who become his followers
(think Peter and Judas). From there he travels to Spanish Harlem
where he meets a prostitute named Maggie (Mary Mag, of course).
And we get running commentary through all of this from a spy, Hunter,
sent by ICON (the global government). The typical Jesus movie
staples follow with modern twists (Hero shoots food out of those hotdog
guns at a stadium instead of multiplying fish on a hillside, Hero
raises a drive-by victim from the dead). Judd falls in with
ICON. Hunter and Maggie fall for each other (a plotline I found
grating and distracting). But mostly Hero does cool stuff and
rocks out.
Awards
Best scene of Jesus
addressing the AIDS crisis- I'm a total sucker for this part.
Best Gethesemane song since
"Gethsemane"- I went through a period where I'd listen to "I Am"
several times a day cause it made me feel good.
The
Last Temptation of Christ
Boy, I really put off watching this
one! Not because I thought it was immoral. I suspected
there wasn't gonna be any thing in it that would run against my
religious beliefs. Basically I just didn't want certain mental
images. But, alas, the temptation (ha ha) was too great after I
saw the 2005 film The Heart of the
Beholder which
was about the onslaught of abuse video store owners faced for carrying
this film. And also, truth be told, I figured if I could watch
John Dye (portrayer of my nearly decade long crush, the angel Andrew)
in a loveless sex scene, I could probly handle Last Temptation. So when it
came on the Sundance Channel this week I taped it and viewed it over
the course of a few hours (had to go to sleep about a third in since it
was nearly 2 AM). Here's my thoughts for whatever they're worth!
First, I gotta admit this was the single most difficult movie for me to
watch and see characters, not actors. I'm willing to admit that's
probly a deficit in my imaginative powers but, to be honest, I think
some of the casting and may be even acting was just plain off. I
kept expecting Judas (Harvey Keitel) to pull a tommy gun from his robe
and start offing people. Similarly, sometimes when Jesus (Willem
Dafoe) smiled it took every ounce of will power to not giggle and cry
"It's the Green Goblin!" But other than that strange impulse, I
enjoyed his performance (though Dafoe looks about as Galilean as my
pasty Irish self but I've learned not to expect realistic
appearance).
Anyhow, so here's the plot as I interpretted it (there are varying
thoughts). If you've not seen the movie and plan to, you should
probly bow out now. Cause if I'd known a certain thing about this
movie that I intend to talk about here, I certainly would have felt
cheated going in. So, now's your chance...
Okay, so the movie starts with Jesus building a cross. Freaked
the heck outta me. Turns out he's commissioned by the Romans to
do so. (More on this later). Enter Judas who is livid that
his old buddy is aiding them. So we have a very troubled
Jesus. He sets off first to seek forgiveness from Mary
Magdalene. What I understood was that they were childhood
sweethearts and possibly betrothed at some point. Jesus broke it
off because he was starting to get the idea he was the Messiah.
Mary M. was hurt and angry and became a prostitute (don't entirely get
her train of thought there but let's move on). So Jesus does all
the typical Jesus stuff. Goes into the desert, seeks out the
Baptist, works some miracles, causes a near riot in the Temple, goes to
Gethsemane, is arrested, tortured, and crucified. Then this movie
goes where (to my knowledge) no Jesus movie went before. While on
the cross, Jesus looks down and sees a young girl. She tells him
she was sent to guard him, that God says his work is done, and that he
can get off the cross if he wants. Here starts the eponymous
"last temptation."
So he's off the cross, comes to a gorgeous valley, and marries Mary
M. And we all get to watch the honeymoon. It was a lil
weird watching that but, IMO, tastefully done. I didn't feel like
I was watching porn in other words. Mary gets pregnant and...
dies. Jesus mourns and gets angry. I sit there and go "What
the heck is going on?!" So that's all very sad and then the angel
says something to the effect of "There's only one woman in the world
just with many faces." So off Jesus goes and seems to marry Mary
of Bethany and her sister Martha. That's a lil hard to take and
you have to keep in mind polygamy was accepted then. Children
follow and Jesus lives the life of a carpenter and family man.
Then when he's on his death bed, in come the apostles including an
angry Judas. Judas decries him for being a coward. He was
supposed to be the Messiah and now here's the ancient, dying man.
Further, Judas tells him his "angel" is no angel but Satan.
Jesus' eyes are opened, he pulls himself off the bed and begs for
forgiveness. And then...
Jesus is on the cross. He cries "It is accomplished" triumphantly
and dies.
So what happened? My personal thought (and what I've heard
Scorcese says) is that a dying Jesus basically becomes George
Bailey. He sees life as it might have been had he chosen the easy
(and wrong) path. By the end of his vision, he knows he was
on the right path and returned to it. So, I do not believe Jesus
got to live two lives in this film any more than I believe I'm pals
with Det. Stabler from Law and
Order:
SVU just because I dreamed I was last night. Basically, I
don't believe the Jesus this film portrays sinned in any way. I
believe he was tempted many times and didn't succumb to any.
That's my take. I'll probly return to this if I get a chance to
see the DVD and hear the commentary. There's lot's more I'd like
to say but this will suffice for now.
However... I do, like Judas, have issues with his building
crosses. That, to me, seems an example of social sin.
Taking part in a sinful societal system. Yet, I don't know enough
to know whether he was compelled to make the crosses under duress or
the wider political implications. Quite possibly had he refused
to make the crosses, that would have made him a zealot and by extension
part of a social structure that embraced violence as a political tactic
also. In any case, I thought this was a thought provoking
movie. It made me really appreciate the sacrifice Jesus
made.
Awards
Best Jesus movie to watch if you want to have an existential
crisis. Seriously, I have no idea what I'm doing with my
life. Watching this I kept thinking "Ah! In 10 years I'll
be 33 like Jesus there and I haven't done anything important!"
But that could just be me at this stage in my life.
Best non-singing music in a Jesus movie. Really, I liked the
Peter Gabriel soundtrack even if it seemed really 80s-ish at
points. And the world music was awesome.
Film ending most likely to lend itself to myriad interpretations and
discussions. Sorta reminded me of American Psycho (another Dafoe
vehicle) and One Hour Photo
insofar as both left me thinking "Did that really happen or was it in
his head??"
Jesus movie that most lends itself to sudden, unwarranted memory
flashes of Jimmy Stewart. No seriously, I kept thinking of It's a Wonderful Life. In
fact, I almost dug the movie out of our Christmas movies box to watch
it afterwards.
(Reviewed 9-21-05)
Well, that's all the movies
I've
seen as of right now, at least those I've seen enough to write about. I
have loved all these different portrayals of Jesus Christ and think the
actors did wonderful jobs. However, if anyone knows of a version in
which Jesus is portrayed by a man looking like one would think a
Nazarene would look, let me know as I would love to see that version.
Thanks!
Back
Jenni's
Place