First, I use the term "Jesus
movies" kinda loosely cause some of my choices might not be your
typical movies about Jesus. Right now they're all pretty traditional,
but that could change. Godspell
has its own page. That's not to say I
like the following necessarily more or less than Godspell, it just has
its own page. However, I did end up adding a portion to this site
about it since my site for it doesn't really say much about my feelings
I don't really know much
about movies and technical stuff but here's my opinion, anyway... Also,
while this page was once supposed to be critical reviews of these
movies, it's turned more into a way in which I hope to be able to keep
all these movies separate. So just because a movie is here does not
necessarily mean I like it nor does a short description mean I disliked
it. I wrote just enough to keep things straight in my mind. Also, I
added a sort of awards section. This, again, is just a means for me to
remember what happened and what I particularly liked from each movie.
Update March 2011- To be blunt,
Autumn 2010 through these first three months of 2011 have been really
difficult for me. I feel like I've grown and changed a lot,
though. This Lent, I have opted not to give anything up. I
think it's a great practice but it just isn't cutting it for me any
more. Instead, I'm going to try to do more for others and even
for myself. So as part of developing my spirituality, I'll be
watching a Jesus
film every week during Lent. Because I'm nearly out of movies, in
some cases it'll be one I've already reviewed here. I will then
reflect on my experience of the movie *now*... with a life that seems
very different than the one I had when I first started this page.
This is the movie CBS played
in
May of 2000. Three hours long and if not my favorite version then very
close (I say that every time I see a new version.) I know some points
were considered kinda controversial but I can't say I was shocked by
anything. I just really liked seeing Jesus dancing, having fun,
*smiling*. (Smiling is a big thing with me.) I also liked how Pilate
was portrayed. Why does he always come off so pitiable? How do we know
he didn't know what he was doing? In this movie, he is portrayed as the
true villain and at least one scene is taken from a historical source
outside the Bible, it demonstrates what Pilate actually did. In short,
the supporting cast of Armin- Mueller Stahl, Jacqueline Bisset, Debra
Messing and others is wonderful. Jeremy Sisto as Jesus depicts every
emotion from delight to sorrow to empathy beautifully. (Disclaimer: Mr.
Sisto is one of my favorite actors so I can hardly be expected to give
an unbiased opinion. Still, I thought his was a very human Jesus, with
out downplaying the divine aspects.)
This was a movie about a man
who
truly loved life and people. My one complaint? CBS didn't show the
original ending! Apparently, Jesus in jeans was too much for them. But
if we're gonna see Satan running around in modern suits to show that
he's ever present shouldn't Jesus, too? This starts with Jesus already
around 30 and shows his previous years via short flashbacks only. Keep
an eye out for some foreshadowing.
This was my favorite for a
while,
too. Christian Bale (Jesus) is one of my two favorite actors (Colin
Firth being the other one, just FYI). Favoritism aside this had its
good points. It was nice to see the story through the eyes of one who
was there when Jesus took both His first and last breathes. Pernilla
August portrays Mary and does an excellent job, in my opinion.
Unfortunately, this also had some drawbacks. Since the movie is through
Mary's eyes we don't get a lot of the usual Jesus movies' staples
(Gethsemane, the Last Supper). Also, if you're like me and prefer a
Jesus who seems happy then you are forewarned, Bale manages to smile
only around 4 times. That aside I'd still recommend the movie. When we
see Mary's grief at losing her own son, the child she raised, we are
reminded of how much love it took for God to sacrifice His Son for us.
This also does a good job of depicting Jesus' life from birth 'til
death. It also has really good attention to detail in what props they
use. (What I mean by this is meaningful objects used early on reappear
later in the movie so naturally your mind wonders to the first time you
saw the object and the juxtaposition of the two scenes is often
emotional.)
This one once topped my list
of
favorite movies. What a surprise! Time's gone by since then and I still
love it. However, I've gone a little bit more in the realist direction
since I first saw this. It has served as a really good way for
remembering verses from the Gospel. Story-wise this is fairly late in
Jesus' preaching career and He seems a bit cynical. Of course, later
when I saw it performed live with Ted Neely starring again it didn't
seem that way so much, who knows. In any case, it managed to attract
its fair share of controversy. Maybe being born at the time I was I
just don't grasp it as much because I've been watching this since I was
a kid. In any case, I love this music. It just never quite leaves you.
("Superstar" is running through my head right now and it's been months
since I last heard it!) It's definitely a different way of looking at
the story! I guess you would expect that from a rock opera about Jesus
that seems to be through the eyes of Judas Iscariot. It also features a
highly pitiable Pontius Pilate. However, if at all possible, I'd
recommend seeing a live production. While the scenery is fantastic
here, nothing beats seeing it live. I'm not even talking about a big
touring production. I saw it at a small, local theatre and was
extremely moved.
I guess this was ABC's answer
to
"Jesus" and "Mary, Mother of Jesus". And it was a good answer. This
time we see the story unfold through the eyes of a young girl, Jairus'
dying daughter. Generally, I'm not a claymation fan but this story can
succeed almost anywhere. Actually, it's not entirely claymation.
Flashbacks, parables, and dreams are depicted in animation. It's pretty
amazing how complete this seems even though it only lasts 1.5 hours.
Also amazing is the voice of Jesus (Ralph Fiennes). It amazes me that
the same voice that drives such horror into a person ("Schindler's
List") can be the voice of Jesus. This is probably one of the best
versions for kids. If you really enjoy this and have a DVD player, I'd
suggest getting the DVD. It has a documentary on how they made it that
was completely amazing. It seems to have been painstakingly and
lovingly done.
Update 2011- So this is my
first Lenten movie. I actually wanted to watch Jesus Christ Superstar but
had a sense this one would be better for me to see tonight. It
was. I needed to see a resurrection. This version offers
three.
First, I'm really glad this take on Jesus' story depicts Mary Magdalene
as mentally ill... not a prostitute. Scripture supports the
former much more than it does the latter. Few movies would give
you that impression, however. Also, for some reason, I love that
after Jesus heals Mary; they do not speak. You see them embrace
and then part and that's it. It's beautiful and somehow
perfect. Dialogue would have ruined it.
I still really love how flashbacks and altered states and the parables
are rendered in cartoon animation. I think the most effective one
for me comes when Jesus enters the tunnel leading to the Temple and
flashes back to Himself as a boy. Suddenly, His anger takes on a
new dimension. I've no doubt His outburst was largely due to the
moral compromises being made there. But it's also easy to relate
in the sense that, as we grow older, disenchantment can really
hurt. How many of us have entered a place that once had such
intense meaning to us and found it wholly unlike what we left
behind? That's tough.
This is such a small thing but sometimes Jesus' clothing looked patched
and threadbare. It's wonderful because His clothes probably
weren't immaculate and whole as they often are in film. For an
animated movie, sometimes this one seems more real than life action
ones.
I don't recall many Jesus movies including the scene of the paralyzed
man lowered through the roof. This one does and it's really
great. The hemorrhaging woman is also left out often but here she
is! That's really an amazing part of the Bible and it's good that
it gets its due here. That woman would have been regarded as
extremely unclean. I mean think about how grossed out guys get
about women's health issues even now sometimes. And here Jesus
doesn't rebuke her or act offended. He praises her. It's
brilliant.
I come to this film still kind of in a place of grief. In this
past year, two people who were to varying degrees part of my life died
suddenly and far too soon. Prior to this period, I'd only
experienced one other death of a young person. Everyone else was
into their seventies and beyond. I certainly grieved when my
grandfathers and others died. But the evidence of their long
lives was everywhere. This has been wholly different. It's
tragic and heartbreaking to see parents mourn their children.
I think this accounts for my first emotional reaction to this. It
comes right before Jesus leaves behind his carpenter gig and sets
out. Mary sits nearby as He sleeps and strokes His hair. As
she does, she flashes back to the Nativity. It's such a
beautifully sad moment. How many parents, facing saying good bye
to their children, have similarly retreated into memory? I think
sometimes we get so caught up in the (albeit very important) religious
meaning of Jesus that we forget He was someone's son, friend, role
model, etc. This film doesn't let us do that. It's a film
about Christ but also about a very loved man who, eventually, is
grieved intensely by real people.
Jesus Himself is shown grieving. His body racks with sobs after
He's told John has been killed. That really got to me this
year. Jesus truly did become one of us with all our heartbreak
and sorrow. He, too, could only weep and cry out to God as those
He loved passed on. We've all been there and, because of the
Incarnation, we have a God who has been there, too.
When Tamar (Jairus' daughter) is taken aback by Jesus failing to go to
Lazarus, He tells her "There is a purpose to our grief." I felt
like He was speaking to me cause I feel like I've spent all these
months trying to find a purpose and wondering if there is one.
The final moment that just wrecked me was after Jesus had died and they
do a short montage of Mary Magdalene grieving. At one point, she
goes back to the cross and is clinging to it and sobbing. That
moment seemed so intensely human and real to me. She went back to
the last place she saw Him. In a way, it seems perverse.
Why would you go back to a place with such painful memories? Why
go back to a place that you know will make you think so overwhelmingly
about them? I don't know. But I find myself going back,
sometimes only mentally, to the last places I saw those I've loved who
have gone to Heaven. The connection is so intense that even in
its pain, it's somehow comforting.
Then, of course, Jesus rises from the dead. And there is immense
joy and laughter. I've no doubt His followers kept that joy in
their hearts their whole lives and that it remains there still in the
house of His Father that He's shown speaking about so often in this
film. And yet, where I am now, I'm left to wonder: were there
times they still mourned the loss of His physical presence? Did
Mary miss stroking His hair? Did Tamar ever reach out for a hand
that was no longer tangible? Something tells me they did.
And, in that, we can find in them kindred spirits. They knew
grief and longing, too. Now they don't. And one day, we
won't, either. We'll be in His Father's house, too, surrounded by
love.
The Life of Jesus:
The
Revolutionary
I'd never seen this before
but it
was on sale so I figured why not? I didn't really expect much but
surprisingly this version was very good. At not quite two hours it
covered more parables and healings than any of the others. The one
thing I was a bit confused by was the organization of the scenes. The
DVD was split into two programs. Side 1 seemed more concerned with the
teachings of Jesus and Side 2 the miracles. Side 1 had a crucifixion
scene and Side 2 the trial and a crucifixion lasting maybe 1 minute. As
to why they didn't put the two together for just one movie I have no
idea. All I can guess was that Side 2 was supposed to be geared towards
younger audiences. This rivals "Jesus" as most representative of how I
view Jesus' personality. It also has some haunting foreshadowing. (Yes,
I love foreshadowing.) Watch what game Jesus plays with the children.
While not depicted on screen it reminds one of a later "game". John Kay
Steel as Jesus does an excellent job and proves a very dramatic
storyteller.
Jesus Christ
Superstar (2000)
This was certainly a
surprise! I'm
used to waiting months from the time I first see a preview to the
actual airing of the movie. Here I saw a preview for JCS before "Meet
the Parents" (I had no idea they were making this version) and two
weeks later I was sitting down to watch it for the first time! Of all
the movies on this page I prolly started this one with the most
trepidation. For one I still liked the old version and for another I'd
heard the old one called "the Disneyfied version" in comparison to this
one and I already thought the 1973 version was dark!
Apparently the idea behind
this
one was how would we react if Jesus came today? The answer? The same as
our ancestors 2000 years ago. Well, except for some added paparazzi,
cargo pants, and machine guns.
I guess the best way to
explain
this one is how it rates compared to the 1973 version. I still like the
singing better in the original but found this version's acting to be
more realistic. Granted, some of the facial expressions are
over-emphasized (these are mostly stage actors). The changes in Judas'
(Jerome Pradon) character I was especially impressed with. He comes off
as being the one who most loved Jesus and even most recognized His true
message (which didn't entail going after the Romans, heavily armed).
But he's not made to look like a trapped saint either (witness his
interaction with Mary). I felt the interaction between Jesus and Judas
in this version was more meaningful and touching.
Now as for Jesus (Glenn
Carter)...
I've read several opinions of the movie and Carter seems to be most
criticized. I'd definitely disagree. In this version I found Jesus to
be far more personable (His interaction with the lepers is a lot more
patient and loving than in the 1973 version.) He also seems a lot more
vulnerable to some of our more unwelcome states (tiredness, distress,
loneliness, etc.) I suppose that's either a plus or negative, depending
on your viewpoint, but I thought it stressed how dear His sacrifice was.
In any case this version is
like
its predecessor in that it is most definitely not your typical Jesus
movie!
Update 2011- I'm surprised at how
little I referenced Mary Magdalene in my original review of this.
Huh.
So I watched this again last week and here are just a few aspects that
I especially found myself focusing on this time around:
1. I really like JCS but am still bothered by the transformation
of Pilate. The dude was not nice. He was not
sympathetic. Further, this piece has only one female role with
any substance. It woulda been nice to retain Pilate's wife as the
dreamer. It's the dream itself that I found myself focusing
on. What did she see in it? How did she cope when, even in
telling her dream, the inevitable still happened? I've had dreams
that have come true and it's just so devastating when you feel like you
may have been able to stop harm from occurring but didn't. I wish
we knew more about her.
2. I feel really, really bad for Mary Magdalene. She's left
with a ghost and a dead body. Nonetheless, she faintly smiles up
at the sky at the end. It's beautiful and inspiring.
3. The close-up on Jesus' death warrant still hits me hard.
It's just so systematic and awful.
4. Jesus looks very peaceful in death. Like He knew exactly
where He was going. I guess I needed to see that so I'm glad I
watched this version.
5. I feel so bad for Mary when Judas kisses her after she's bared
her soul for Jesus as He slept. You can tell she wants Jesus to
do something. He does not.
This telling of Jesus' story
comes
from the Roman tribune who crucified Jesus and won His robe. The
tribune, Marcellius, is sent from Rome to Jerusalem and arrives, with
his slaves, in Jerusalem on Palm Sunday. He is briefed on the story of
"the Fanatic". His newly acquired Greek slave, Demetrius, makes eye
contact with Jesus and knows there's something to this claim of His
Messiahship. Demetrius learns of the plot against Jesus and goes to
warn Him. Unfortunately, he arrives too late and the next time he sees
Jesus is on the path to Golgotha. When Marcellius wins Jesus' robe,
Demetrius honors it for what it is, the robe of God. Marcellius demands
Demetrius give him the robe to cover himself when the heavy rains start
after Jesus' death. The minute Marcellius touches the robe he cries in
pain and Demetrius grabs it back, cursing Marcellius for killing Jesus
and running away.
Marcellius returns to Rome
and is
unable to go on with his duties because he believes the robe bewitched
him for he finds himself unable to remember Good Friday with out losing
his mind. Therefore, he is sent back to Jerusalem by the Caesar to find
this cursed robe and destroy it. Along the way Marcellius finds himself
in Cana, a small Christian community. He grows to love its people but
harbors the awful secret that he killed their Lord. He also finds
Demetrius and learns that the robe has no power, only his guilt does.
Simon Peter visits the village and tells Marcellius his own story of
denying Jesus and teaches him that Jesus' cry "God forgive them." was
meant for all of them. He joins Peter and Demetrius in their mission
and finds himself back in Rome where he faces the ultimate test: Deny
his new faith and live or die as a martyr.
I thought this was a really
interesting movie. I'd expected the typical staples of miracles,
parables, the Last Supper and the rest. This movie only showed Jesus
twice (and never His face) and He only had two lines. Obviously it had
some historical inaccuracies but if you can get past that there's some
excellent teachings like what does it mean to be healed and the beauty
of giving and the power of God's forgiveness.
This is not the same as the
CBS
version. The version is a lot more "by the Book", in fact it tells the
story as related in the Gospel of Luke. Jesus was well portrayed,
smiling and laughing, sad and angry. There was also some foreshadowing
(!). Prolly what struck me most was how idyllic and peaceful the many
scenes of Jesus and His disciples walking around were. They just
generally looked like a group you'd want to hang around with. Unlike
the other versions this one also had a narrator which was kinda
interesting. It also had a bunch of scenes that I'd never seen in any
other movies like the near-assassination of Jesus in Nazareth, the
angel's appearance in Gethsemane, Simeon's blessing on baby Jesus.
Those scenes were interesting to see.
It did an excellent job of
depicting Luke but I really missed the other Gospels. Gone was Lazarus,
no wine into water, etc. But naturally when you make a movie you have
to make choices about what to keep and what to take out so that's okay.
It was really hard to not have Mary at the Crucifixion, though. The
Crucifixion itself was very reverent but it seemed to be missing
something. It just didn't have the impact the others generally do. It
almost looked too easy. The Resurrection scenes seemed more complete
than usual, however. In general, I liked it mostly because it featured
events often ignored by the other movies.
What do you get when you take
a
beloved book, Patrick Swayze's traitor-friend from "Ghost", Salieri
from "Amadeus" and put them together? It's the movie version of Fr.
Joseph Girzone's book "Joshua", which became an entire series. If
you're hoping for a very by-the-book dramatization, this is not for
you. The Jewish characters that were plentiful in the book have been
narrowed down to one guy. Large sections of the book are skipped, new
parts are added, and all flashbacks have been excised. However, I think
the spirit of the book remains intact. Joshua still stands up against
the church hierarchy. He stills changes the lives of the citizens of
Auburn and, naturally, does the whole carpenter gig.
Some of it's corny, some of
the
minor characters aren't exactly Oscar-caliber performers but it's a
good film. I was concerned when I heard Tony Goldwyn (Carl from "Ghost"
and Creepy Rapist Guy from "Kiss the Girls") would be playing Joshua
but it works. He comes off as really sincere, really human, and by the
end of the movie really something beyond human. F. Murray Abraham is
interesting as Fr. Tardone. He reminds me of way too many actual
priests... It's a good performance that could have easily turned
cartoonish but is kept real.
Okay, in short, "The Cotton
Patch
Gospel" seems to be "Godspell" gone South. Not that I have any real
reason to believe "Godspell" was composed and/or conceived in the North
but I tend to associate it with Broadway and Canada so... They're both
really minimalistic as far as props and scenery. CPG takes it one step
further making it a one-man show plus a four man chorus. The story is
basically what if Jesus had been born in modern Georgia instead of
Israel 2000 years ago?
Jesus is born to Mary and
Joseph
Davidson (haha) on their way to an IRS tax audit. He's born in an
abandoned trailer. Three scholars visit leaving him a Gold Mastercard,
peach scented candles, and a fancy bottle of cologne. Word gets to
Governor Herod who has a bomb thrown into a nursery, hoping to kill the
baby. By this time Joseph and Family have fled to Mexico. The show then
follows the family on their trip to Georgia with young Jesus, his
departure to start his ministry, and finally his lynching and
resurrection.
Awards
This gets the Best Massacre
of the
Infants scene. A macabre award, for sure. You don't actually see
anything since this is just a stage with five guys on it. But the
Narrator (who turns out to be Matthew but who plays everyone) talks
about the doctor explaining to women that their children died and Harry
Chapin wrote two really good pieces of music that are sung against each
other. One is "I Did It" sung by Herod and Crew which talks about the
dirty deeds carried out in the name of political glory. At the same
time a lone guy sings "Mama is Here", a lullaby. It was really
poignant for a scene that is often glossed over in other
interpretations.
The next "award" is the Best
Wine
into Water scene. The story is Jesus is at a wedding where the bride is
the daughter of a man who supports Joseph's carpentry shop. They run
out
of wine Joseph suggests that Jesus might... get some. So Jesus goes off
alone and asks his Daddy to help. It was cool that he used Daddy in
this one cause Abba is usually translated into "father" but most
everything I read said it was a more familiar term like "daddy" or
"papa". He tries snapping his fingers, he tries concentrating really
hard, he tries doing a jig in front of it, finally he relaxes and gives
up and... it changes. It was just cool to see Jesus' own surprise at
his abilities. Generally he seems really cool and collected in other
depictions of this scene.
Okay, next was the Best
Raising of
Jairus' Daughter Scene. I might actually have to check on that one,
though. "The Miracle Maker" is the story told through the eyes of
Jairus' daughter so you'd think that might be better. Then again, since
I don't remember that scene maybe not... Anyhow, Jairus informed Jesus
he was returning to his home and was going to bring his four year old
back to life. He was very definite. So Jesus went into where the girl
was lying and started to sing "Love the Lord, your God, with all your
heart, soul, and mind. Love your neighbor as you love yourself." Jesus
sang the first part and then you heard this smaller voice join in, the
little girl (although it was actually a grown guy). The whole time the
camera was positioned so that you were seeing what the girl would have
seen. It was a really beautiful scene.
Then there was what I think
was
one of the best depictions of the first prediction of the Passion. I
have a vague feeling there's another movie that I also think does a
great job here but I can't recall right now. Anyhow, Jesus announces
they will be going to Atlanta for a Bible Convention thing. Where he
will be lynched. The song "Going to Atlanta" is part the disciples
celebrating with a loud, happy song with a much quieter, sad Jesus
singing "What does Atlanta mean to me?" The two parts just really added
potency. That was the end of the first act.
My first favorite part in the
second act was the song "You are Still My Boy" sung by Mary and Joseph
after Jesus has turned away from his hometown which has rejected him.
It's just a really sad and beautiful song. Probably my second favorite
Jesus Returns Home scene. It's edged out only slightly by "The Greatest
Story Ever Told". What I liked about the CPG version was that it dealt
head on with Jesus' apparent abandonment of his family but with out
either party looking bad.
And there was the best Who Do
You
Say I Am? scene. Peter struggles with the answer. Doesn't know...
doesn't know... keeps repeating it and then has a moment of clarity and
says "You are the Son of God!" and Jesus answers "You are beautiful!"
It was funny and sweet at the same time.
The betrayal scene was very
sad. I
thought all the "villains" were well characterized. Judd aka Judas was
pathetic with out being totally acceptable. Pilate originally appeared
to be nice, as proven by the song title "Thank God for Governor
Pilate". That was another instance of great government-related irony as
happened with "I Did It". Pilate chooses to send Jesus to a prison,
just until things quiet down and he can get a fair trial. This makes
everyone happy. The chorus sings about all the great things Pilate does
while, secretly, Pilate is making a call to his uncle. He gives him the
exact route Jesus' transportation...
Matthew explains what
happened on
Friday, when they got the news of what happened. Thursday night the
tires of the truck had been shot out. Jesus was being transported by
only 2 guards. They were easily over-powered by several members of the
Klan. He was whipped 39 times and lynched.
But this movie had a
Resurrection,
unlike the "Godspell" movie. That was really cool. I mean there weren't
any special effects or anything. It was just really well-written. Then
they ended with Harry Chapin's "I Wonder What Would Happen to This
World" and a medley. I was kinda worried when I first popped in the
tape. I'm not a country music fan. And I'm really not a bluegrass fan.
But maybe I've been converted... The songs are all ready getting stuck!
Update 2011- I really don't have
much to add as my original review was pretty thorough. But I'm
really glad I watched this today. All in all, I think this is the
Jesus movie that makes me happiest.
First, it's a recording of a live performance so ya kinda feel like
you're there. (In 80s gear!) And live theatre is such an
invigorating experience for me. So if I can't actually be at a
live performance, this is the next best thing.
Second, "When I Look Up" was the stand-out number for me this
time. As I wrote when I started these updates, I'm going through
a rough patch and this lil song is so filled with hope.
Third, I really love how much Jesus does NOT know in this. He's
depicted as a man of incredible faith who very much believes in His
Father. But he has his doubts. Which also means he's
incredibly and rather sweetly amazed when miracles happen.
Fourth, I'd been trying to remember what version it was in which Jesus
repeated variations of "Live my life!" It's this one. Such
a beautiful idea. We continue to live the lives of those who
touched us.
If someone was feeling down, I think this is the version I'd be most
apt to recommend.
Traditional story line,
only an
hour long so some things were dropped, obviously. Johnny Cash narrates
the whole thing and had the only speaking role save his wife, June
Carter Cash, who was Mary M. So instead of Jesus saying "I am the Way",
Cash would say something like "And Jesus said many beautiful things
like 'I am the Way'". At first this was kinda boring but I got the
point later. I think maybe he was trying to maintain the fact that
Jesus did not speak English. This become clearer during the "Cast the
first stone" scene. During the part when Jesus is writing in the sand,
he was writing in either Hebrew or Aramaic.
While the movie was only an
hour
long but it didn't really feel like any *major* events were sacrificed
for time, any more so than other movies. It probably would not be a
good movie for people trying to get an in-depth understanding of the
Gospels, though. The highlights of his teachings were covered but there
weren't actual teaching scenes. There were a couple interesting "crowd
scenes". During Palm Sunday and the Way of the Cross you could hear
crowds but only see Jesus wandering down abandoned roads.I'm not sure
what to make of that. Maybe it was trying to say that mentally Jesus
had to walk those roads alone. I don't know, it was just kinda jarring
to first see when you're so used to huge crowds.
I did like that the movie
respected Jesus' culture and religion. Cash outright states that
"Jesus was born a Jew." That seems like a stupid thing for me to harp
on but it is true and too often forgotten, IMO. If everyone really
seriously thought about that then maybe anti-Semitism would die out, or
at least take a major hit.
The music was pretty good, I
don't
particularly like the style but that considered there were some
down-right catchy tunes.
Awards
First, best use of flashbacks
in a
Jesus movie. This was particularly effective twice. First, when Jesus
was playing with kids and there's a flash of Jesus as a little boy.
Second, when Jesus was being crucified and again their was the flash of
him as a boy and another of him as a man, a nonbeat-up man. Flashbacks
always make me cry...
Second, this wins for
grooviest
camera work. Triple takes, changes in perspective, etc.
Third, best scene of Jesus
making
sandcastles. Okay, well, maybe the only scene of Jesus making
sandcastles but that makes it cool. It was during the scene of Jesus
and the children. I liked that a whole segment was devoted to that
aspect instead of a brief "Oh look! Jesus is holding a baby, aww!!"
Fourth, best scene of guy
getting
his sight back. I just really liked the song Johnny Cash was singing
during that part.
The Passion of
the Christ
I guess it only makes sense I
should pipe up with my take on this much-talked-about movie. So here
goes...
I liked it. Didn't love it.
Didn't
come out feeling like I'd just had a life-altering experience. It was
what it was. Which is a movie. As for the violence... crucifixion is
violent. It was bloody, it was disgusting, it was degrading, it was
painful. I went into the movie expecting that, having read several
articles looking at crucifixion from social, anatomical, and faith
perspectives. So I was not shocked. As for charges of anti-Semitism, I
can see where that comes from. I do think it was a poor decision to
have the Temple destroyed. However, I can't say I think it was any more
anti-Semitic than you could say JCS is. At least in this version Gibson
depicts a high priest protesting the treatment of Jesus. JCS doesn't
even have that. I think it's a case of seeing what you want to see. I
believe anti-Semitism is a sin so this movie did not cause any of those
feelings in myself. If others did take that away from the movie I think
that's very, very sad.
I thought the movie was
beautifully acted. Though, gotta say I was most captivated by the
actress playing Mary of Nazareth (Maia Morgenstern). I only cried once
during the movie and that was during the scene where Jesus falls and
she flashes back to him falling as a boy. And her eyes as she held his
dead body are haunting. This is not to say I thought Jim Caviezel
wasn't great. He definitely was. I give credit to anyone who takes on
such a physically demanding role and learns a dead language! But what I
tend to focus on with movies is what sets them apart. And I think what
we got here is a very real Mary which isn't all that common, I don't
think.
I do think the demonic stuff
was a
lil... Stephen King TV movie-ish. No one I know has yet to
satisfactorily answer for themselves what the heck Satan was doing
holding a demonic baby. It seemed random and, I thought, distracting.
As for Satan, I thought that character was very well done. Very creepy
but also more "natural" looking than the demons. I guess one would hope
an actual actress would look more natural than animatronics or computer
animation or whatever the heck the demons were. :-)
There was one point that I'm
still
unsure of what I think. That's the role of women. The women in this
movie almost seemed to be magical. Which I'd like to think women are,
personally. Mary knowing where Jesus was. Pilate's wife gliding in to
comfort the two Marys. Veronica gliding in... But there was something
about it that didn't quite strike me as right... Maybe it's just that
with Jesus incapacitated for much of the movie, the women were really
the only positive characters. And that's more than a lil scary to think
about. Anyway, it's been a month since I've seen this movie and will
maybe revisit this if I ever see it again. So now, the awards:
Awards
First, best use of psychic
connection. While the other "magical women" elements may have bugged
me, Mary sensing Jesus' presence in the cell beneath her really got me.
I loved that.
Second, best use of
flashbacks
*sometimes.* I was really moved by the one of Jesus as a lil boy, as
mentioned before. Others I thought were more distracting and seemed
randomly placed but that was really good. I also liked the flashbacks
to Jesus meeting Mary Magdalene.
Third, best attempt at
linguistic
accuracy. Whatever else may have been wrong, I gotta give Mel Gibson
credit for putting a lot of the movie into Aramaic! Yikes! The whole
Greek-Latin confusion I'm not sure about so I'll let that slide. That
being said, I wish he'd extended that accuracy to hiring actors that
looked more appropriate. But it was well-acted and I suppose we can
only ask for so much realism from Hollywood.
Wow... What can I say? I'm
sure
there was a lot of love that went into this and I'm sure they were
really trying to do something moving and interesting. But I started to
get curious the minute they started showing promos for this. The only
movie told from Judas' perspective? Definitely not true. "Jesus Christ
Superstar" anyone? Or there was a slightly older Judas movie that aired
on Pax. But promotion problems aside...
I thought the guy playing
Judas
was pretty good. And I wish he'd played Jesus. Or that someone else
had! No offense to that actor but... Good gosh! In my opinion, it's
never a good sign when you're watching a Jesus movie and feel the need
to "Awww, poor baby!" Jesus repeatedly. Jesus was a leader. And
apparently a pretty strong one to have inspired so many people to the
point they would later die for him. But this guy... I'm not sure I'd
feel confident following him to the grocery store. He completely lacked
confidence! And apparently the followers he drew to him were much the
same. St. Andrew... Good gosh. I wanted to sit that guy down with a
blankie and some cookies and milk.
I was just... dumb-founded.
Anyway, in an interesting note: I think some of these sets were from
the 2000 Jesus movie. I'd heard this movie had used sets from a
previous Bible movie and I'm thinking it was definitely that one. In a
way, that made the movie even worse. I mean the 2000 version may not be
the most accurate or greatest thing out there but this movie did not
benefit from the comparison.
Awards
Best Jesus movie to watch if
you
just want to go "Ummm, what the heck?" repeatedly.
Before I get into this I'm
gonna
clear up a couple misconceptions I had about this that others may
also. First, the press seemed to suggest this was Jesus' story as
if he'd been born today. I didn't find that to be true.
Cause last I checked there wasn't a worldwide government and New York
was not a police state. I think the point *may* have been that
the world might have come to that with out Jesus' influence 2000 years
ago. I guess when I heard the phrase "If he came today..." I
envisioned a story with a more realistic setting. This came off
as futuristic which was fine. I'm just saying the press I
read/saw didn't give that impression. Second, I always thought a
rock opera (which is what "!Hero" is called) consisted of only sung
dialogue. Like Andrew Lloyd Webber's "JCS", "Evita", and
"Joseph". "!Hero" has lots of spoken dialogue. Which,
again, I had no problem with. It's just didn't fit my definition
of a rock opera which, I admit, may be totally incorrect.
Anyhow, now that that's done
the
basic plot is thus: a child is born to Mary in Bethlehem,
Pennsylvania. She names the boy Hero (and Jesus, I didn't
entirely follow whether Hero was his nickname or his name was Jesus
Hero or something). Hero grows up and at some point moves to New
York City. It's there he begins to spread the message of God's
love. He first tells Petrov and Judd who become his followers
(think Peter and Judas). From there he travels to Spanish Harlem
where he meets a prostitute named Maggie (Mary Mag, of course).
And we get running commentary through all of this from a spy, Hunter,
sent by ICON (the global government). The typical Jesus movie
staples follow with modern twists (Hero shoots food out of those hot
dog
guns at a stadium instead of multiplying fish on a hillside, Hero
raises a drive-by victim from the dead). Judd falls in with
ICON. Hunter and Maggie fall for each other (a plot line I found
grating and distracting). But mostly Hero does cool stuff and
rocks out.
Awards
Best scene of Jesus
addressing the AIDS crisis- I'm a total sucker for this part.
Best Gethsemane song since
"Gethsemane"- I went through a period where I'd listen to "I Am"
several times a day cause it made me feel good.
The
Last Temptation of Christ
Boy, I really put off watching this
one! Not because I thought it was immoral. I suspected
there wasn't gonna be any thing in it that would run against my
religious beliefs. Basically I just didn't want certain mental
images. But, alas, the temptation (ha ha) was too great after I
saw the 2005 film The Heart of the
Beholder which
was about the onslaught of abuse video store owners faced for carrying
this film. And also, truth be told, I figured if I could watch
John Dye (portrayer of my nearly decade long crush, the angel Andrew)
in a loveless sex scene, I could probly handle Last Temptation. So when it
came on the Sundance Channel this week I taped it and viewed it over
the course of a few hours (had to go to sleep about a third in since it
was nearly 2 AM). Here's my thoughts for whatever they're worth!
First, I gotta admit this was the single most difficult movie for me to
watch and see characters, not actors. I'm willing to admit that's
probly a deficit in my imaginative powers but, to be honest, I think
some of the casting and may be even acting was just plain off. I
kept expecting Judas (Harvey Keitel) to pull a tommy gun from his robe
and start offing people. Similarly, sometimes when Jesus (Willem
Dafoe) smiled it took every ounce of will power to not giggle and cry
"It's the Green Goblin!" But other than that strange impulse, I
enjoyed his performance (though Dafoe looks about as Galilean as my
pasty Irish self but I've learned not to expect realistic
appearance).
Anyhow, so here's the plot as I interpreted it (there are varying
thoughts). If you've not seen the movie and plan to, you should
probly bow out now. Cause if I'd known a certain thing about this
movie that I intend to talk about here, I certainly would have felt
cheated going in. So, now's your chance...
Okay, so the movie starts with Jesus building a cross. Freaked
the heck outta me. Turns out he's commissioned by the Romans to
do so. (More on this later). Enter Judas who is livid that
his old buddy is aiding them. So we have a very troubled
Jesus. He sets off first to seek forgiveness from Mary
Magdalene. What I understood was that they were childhood
sweethearts and possibly betrothed at some point. Jesus broke it
off because he was starting to get the idea he was the Messiah.
Mary M. was hurt and angry and became a prostitute (don't entirely get
her train of thought there but let's move on). So Jesus does all
the typical Jesus stuff. Goes into the desert, seeks out the
Baptist, works some miracles, causes a near riot in the Temple, goes to
Gethsemane, is arrested, tortured, and crucified. Then this movie
goes where (to my knowledge) no Jesus movie went before. While on
the cross, Jesus looks down and sees a young girl. She tells him
she was sent to guard him, that God says his work is done, and that he
can get off the cross if he wants. Here starts the eponymous
"last temptation."
So he's off the cross, comes to a gorgeous valley, and marries Mary
M. And we all get to watch the honeymoon. It was a lil
weird watching that but, IMO, tastefully done. I didn't feel like
I was watching porn in other words. Mary gets pregnant and...
dies. Jesus mourns and gets angry. I sit there and go "What
the heck is going on?!" So that's all very sad and then the angel
says something to the effect of "There's only one woman in the world
just with many faces." So off Jesus goes and seems to marry Mary
of Bethany and her sister Martha. That's a lil hard to take and
you have to keep in mind polygamy was accepted then. Children
follow and Jesus lives the life of a carpenter and family man.
Then when he's on his death bed, in come the apostles including an
angry Judas. Judas decries him for being a coward. He was
supposed to be the Messiah and now here's the ancient, dying man.
Further, Judas tells him his "angel" is no angel but Satan.
Jesus' eyes are opened, he pulls himself off the bed and begs for
forgiveness. And then...
Jesus is on the cross. He cries "It is accomplished" triumphantly
and dies.
So what happened? My personal thought (and what I've heard
Scorcese says) is that a dying Jesus basically becomes George
Bailey. He sees life as it might have been had he chosen the easy
(and wrong) path. By the end of his vision, he knows he was
on the right path and returned to it. So, I do not believe Jesus
got to live two lives in this film any more than I believe I'm pals
with Det. Stabler from Law and
Order:
SVU just because I dreamed I was last night. Basically, I
don't believe the Jesus this film portrays sinned in any way. I
believe he was tempted many times and didn't succumb to any.
That's my take. I'll probly return to this if I get a chance to
see the DVD and hear the commentary. There's lot's more I'd like
to say but this will suffice for now.
However... I do, like Judas, have issues with his building
crosses. That, to me, seems an example of social sin.
Taking part in a sinful societal system. Yet, I don't know enough
to know whether he was compelled to make the crosses under duress or
the wider political implications. Quite possibly had he refused
to make the crosses, that would have made him a zealot and by extension
part of a social structure that embraced violence as a political tactic
also. In any case, I thought this was a thought provoking
movie. It made me really appreciate the sacrifice Jesus
made.
Awards
Best Jesus movie to watch if you want to have an existential
crisis. Seriously, I have no idea what I'm doing with my
life. Watching this I kept thinking "Ah! In 10 years I'll
be 33 like Jesus there and I haven't done anything important!"
But that could just be me at this stage in my life.
Best non-singing music in a Jesus movie. Really, I liked the
Peter Gabriel soundtrack even if it seemed really 80s-ish at
points. And the world music was awesome.
Film ending most likely to lend itself to myriad interpretations and
discussions. Sorta reminded me of American Psycho (another Dafoe
vehicle) and One Hour Photo
insofar as both left me thinking "Did that really happen or was it in
his head??"
Jesus movie that most lends itself to sudden, unwarranted memory
flashes of Jimmy Stewart. No seriously, I kept thinking of It's a Wonderful Life. In
fact, I almost dug the movie out of our Christmas movies box to watch
it afterwards.
(Reviewed 9-21-05)
The
Gospel of John
This had sat on my bookshelf,
unopened, for far too long. Seeing as today is Palm Sunday, I
wanted to watch a Jesus movie and went with this one. I should
say right off the bat that this was not an ideal movie-watching
experience. I got interrupted and distracted numerous times (not
by choice). So what I say may not be 100% accurate.
First, I really liked the actor (Henry Ian Cusick) they got to play
Jesus. He was very personable and smiled a lot. He seemed
to really like people. I know it probably seems like those should
be no-brainer qualities for Jesus but in some films he seems too
serious and emotionally distant. But this guy interacted really
well with the other actors, I thought. His smiles seemed
downright contagious. Sometimes he even smirks which was pretty
endearing, especially in the scene with Mary, his mother, at the
wedding.
Jesus also seemed to passionately believe and even love his own
teachings. This may also seem like a "duh" thing but here he was
so fired up and excited during some of his longer monologues.
Sometimes Jesus comes off as a little too low key in movies. I
also think the actor hit the right notes with the not-so-pleasant
emotions of Jesus. He seems genuinely disappointed that people
don't believe him, hate him, and want to stone him. I'm gonna
guess most people watching this movie already feel an emotional bond to
the real Jesus. But if not I think this depiction might aid that
more than some others.
I also really loved some of the technical aspects of this film.
At times the lighting seemed like it came from a magical realism sorta
film. I'm thinking especially of the fig tree scene with
Nathaniel. Other visual tricks I thought were cool were just
random shots like falling coins, horses' hooves, etc. I also
liked how a few times they'd start with a full body shot of someone,
then close into their face, then close in even further to just their
eyes. This happens in the Temple destruction scene and was really
effective. Another good use of imagery was Lazarus'
healing. Showing his shadow first really built up the
anticipation.
The sound editing seemed really strong, too. The swooshing of the
whip and the falling coins in the Temple really stood out. Of
course, sometimes it was really unpleasant. I actually jumped
when you heard them break the legs of the two men crucified with
Jesus.
I'm a little torn on the Narrator. Christopher Plummer did a
great job and it was cool to bring in the more lyrical, beautiful
passages that don't really lend themselves to visuals. But at
times the narration seemed redundant. I don't think we needed to
hear "he straightened" or "he spat and made mud" when we either already
saw it happen or very soon will. I also really, really disliked
that instead of seeing "Jesus wept" we only heard it.
Because this was based on the Gospel of John, we get to see a lot of
scenes that are often left out of Jesus movies. Here are a few
that stood out for me:
- Jesus' exchange with Nicodemus about
being born again. As much as the phrase "born again" gets used,
you'd think this discussion would make it into more of the
Gospel-inspired films.
- Jesus' meeting with the Samaritan woman
at the well. The eagerness she had to hear him and her
enthrallment with what he was saying was compelling to watch.
(And seeing Jesus later holding her child was a nice bonus.)
- The soldier whose son Jesus heals.
It seems like more films show the healing of Jairus' daughter than
this. I like including this because it demonstrates early on that
Jesus' message will go beyond the Jewish community.
- All the angry crowds. In most
films you don't get much of a hint of Jesus angering anyone but TPTB
until right before his death. Here we see many of the times he
angered random people, even nearly getting stoned.
- The arrival of the Greeks.
This so seldom gets mentioned that I'd completely forgotten it even
happening. Guess I should go reread the Gospel of John.
- Jesus comparing the feelings of his
followers regarding his death to childbirth. I've just always
liked that comparison.
- Jesus questioning Peter 3 times
about if he loves him. I've always been partial to this scene as
I see it as Jesus giving Peter the opportunity to set aside his guilt
for denying him. It's really beautiful.
I liked the way Jesus and his brothers were depicted prior to the
festival. Just something about them buzzing around, another
behind him also working on carpentry touched me. And it also made
me think: did Jesus not go to the festival with his family because he
was trying to distance himself from them for their own
well-being?
I couldn't help but compare this to The Passion of the Christ
since they were released so closely together. I have to say I
prefer how this film showed the beating and crucifixion. For the
scourging you only see the Roman, not Jesus. So when he reappears
it's shocking and horrifying. When last you saw him he looked
normal, then suddenly he's torn up. To me, *this* is more
effective than the uber-violence of The Passion.
The dividing of Jesus' clothes is always a macabre part of the
story. But for some reason it seemed even more so in this
film. Grotesque, really.
I was a lil bummed by Mary Magdalene's silence up until the very
end. But given this is going right from the Gospel of John they
couldn't have rightly given her more to say.
Beautiful scenery.
Awards
Great visual interpretation of the healing of the man
born blind. One of the older movies also has a version of this I
love though right now which one it is escapes me. But I really
like this one. First, I think it's good to show that Jesus didn't
equate illness or disability with sin. Even today some people
still do. Second, I really like the reaction of the blind
man. He shakes. He shuts his eyes. I think this is
far more realistic than him immediately rejoicing. After all, the
man *never* saw. I would think for a while overstimulation would
be an issue.
Another great use of flashbacks. I'm a sucker for them. And
sepia is a good hue. The ones they show during the final
dissertation made me all emotional. And I thought that was the
extent of it but then they did the "May they be one" montage and that
was gorgeous.
Most "Tour of Duty" like image. There was a shot of Jesus and Co.
going over a hill and it was from far away and you could pretty much
just see their silhouettes. It made me expect to hear "Paint It
Black."
Random Questions
Okay... maybe this is a weird thought to even have
but how did the crowd of 5,000 eat that fish? When they pan out I
didn't see any fires going. Did I just miss them or was the fish
already cooked (didn't look like it to me)?
Has anyone else seen a lot of Jesus movies and started to think some of
the same actors are involved? I can't decide if some of these
people were also in the CBS Jesus
or if after a while bearded, long-haired men in white robes just start
to resemble each other to me.
Is it just me or did this movie kinda make Caiaphas out to be a sort of
prophet? I just thought it was a little odd how they explained
his "it's better that one man die for the good of the people"
line. I think Caiaphas was being pragmatic but not necessarily
any more than that.
This is sooo not important in the scheme of things but why make the
robe the Romans put Jesus in red when the narration is saying purple?
(Reviewed 4-5-09)
I saw this years ago and remembered
liking it though I didn't recall much about it. So when I saw the
entire "Close to Jesus" set on sale on Amazon.com, I ordered it.
I can see what I liked about this movie although some parts of it
grated on me this time around. But first... the story:
I appreciated that the film went a route completely different from the
usual Mary-as-prostitute story. Right off the bat we see her as a
rich man's loving wife, working on her lands, and healing people (as a
doctor, not a miracle healer). However, they've not had a child
and so her husband divorces her and sends her away. She departs
with a Roman soldier who she comes to love and conceives a child with
(guess the barren one wasn't her). At this point my feeling that
this was rather like a biblical Lifetime movie (of the "men are evil"
variety) really grew. In the course of the next thirty minutes
the following occurs: Roman soldier beats Mary, she's then gang-raped
by his men, she miscarries, and then she attempts suicide. (This
film is not for kids!) So it is somewhere in between a Lifetime
movie and a soap opera. But if you can make it through that then
things do get interesting on a less violent and overwrought level...
after the (yes, I'm totally serious) makeover scene.
The movie covers Mary's rise through the ranks as a servant in King
Herod's home, her romance with a second Roman soldier (this one
infinitely more promising), her friendship with John the Baptist, her
devotion to Salome, and, of course, her eventual meeting with
Jesus. I was not overly struck by Jesus in this. However,
right towards the end when he smiles up at Mary and holds his hand out
to her... the actor won me over. So I look forward to seeing him
in at least 2 of the other films, I believe. Just a heads up,
though: after the feet washing scene the film fast forwards in a huge
way to about 10 seconds of the crucifixion so don't watch this film if
you're looking for much on Jesus' ministry.
This more than other Jesus films deals with gender
politics and the instability of power, I think. Herodias is just
a
bundle of sadly realistic bits of advice like "Love is power" for
women. By which she makes it clear she means sex. She
follows it up
with a depressing sentiment: "Love is a luxury. It's denied to
women." Makes a person realize how few options women had.
And sometimes men do no better... More than one character in this
film goes from riches to rags or lives in constant worry of it.
Awards
I think, despite its soapishness, this film really
does have its good points. I like that Mary's complex.
She's angry at God for all that's befallen her yet spiritually
searching. She wants desperately to be loved but she's also
jaded. She misses her wealth and power yet comes to see the
horror that can come from power.
I think this may be the best use of Salome. Who knows what the
girl was really like but it's not as if she had an easy time of
it. Her mother was morally suspect and controlling. Her
uncle's also her lecherous step-dad. And, as this movie reminds
us, she was at a difficult age. I'm not convinced she deserves
the villainous role so often given to her. I think it was
interesting to have Mary befriend her (first in helping her through her
first period and on through her desire to marry) and actually see how
badly placed this girl is.
I really like this John the Baptist. I was impressed with the way
he was presented far more than I was with Jesus here. Although,
to be fair, Jesus is hardly in this. But something about the guy
playing John really grabbed me. And he has my favorite
non-biblical line in the whole film. Mary asks him where God's
love is in the midst of war and misery. Moved, John answers: "God
hides Himself from us. So we find Him through longing."
That speaks so much to there here and now, I feel.
This film gives John's story more attention than Jesus' which may
disappoint some. However, as I have a whole shelf of Jesus
movies, I found it moving to focus on John's sacrifice and
struggles. The way he tears up when he foretells his own death
was stirring.
By focusing so much on the politics of the time, characters from many
different backgrounds are introduced. I loved seeing so many
different costumes.
I liked the Vitellio character (hope I got the name right,
he was the 2nd Roman soldier). I thought he saved this movies
from being a total "all men but the holy ones are evil!" rant.
Granted, he did some bad stuff as a soldier but I think he really loved
Mary. At their parting he wishes that she finds what she
needs. Massive improvement over the first lout. So I'll
give an award for a compelling non-biblical character.
Random Questions
I thought the apostles fishing Mary out after her
suicide attempt was a lil unrealistic. But I think the scene does
suggest an interesting theory about the nature of the demon possession
so many people had. In this Mary freaks out because she's
surrounded by these men who make her flashback to the rape
(understandably). Makes a person wonder how many of the
"possessed" people actually had PTSD, schizophrenia, etc.?
(Reviewed 4-26-09)
Judas
(2001)
This came in the same boxed set
along with Mary Magdalene
and two others. When the set arrived, one disk was floating
around in the box. I couldn't recall whether it was MM or this
one. So I basically watched this movie just to ensure the disk
worked. Given that less-than-thrilling justification, I actually
liked this movie. IMO, it is leaps and bounds better than the
2004 telefilm of the same name.
First, this movie did at times call Jesus Christ Superstar to
mind which is probably not surprising given JCS was the first movie I
ever saw to depict Jesus' story through Judas' eyes. But it's
more than that. The film starts on Palm Sunday so it all takes
place in that last week of Jesus' life, as with JCS. However, it
was the electric guitar in the score that really put me in mind of the
rock opera. I wonder if it was intentional? Because I
really don't recall electric guitar being featured in the MM
film. It was especially attention-grabbing right after Judas
kisses Jesus in the garden and there's a riff. JCS all the way!
The plot is basically this: Judas have been cast out of his family for
joining Jesus. The trip to Jerusalem brings them back to his
hometown and Judas tries to reunite with his family... and his
girlfriend, Rachel. Judas, a former Zealot, fully embraces Jesus'
message of non-violence. The same cannot be said of Rachel and
Judas' former friends. Rachel tells Judas that her brother,
Disma, has been arrested and she needs 30 pieces of silver to get his
name on the list of prisoners possibly to be freed on Passover.
Judas ultimately agrees though he struggles with the idea of taking the
silver from the money he manages for Jesus and Co. Unbeknownst to
him, Disma is free and part of a plot to kill Pilate and that's why
Rachel needed the money. When Judas realizes the betrayal of
Rachel, his world shatters and he loses sight of who he can
trust. Meanwhile, the Romans trace the silver to Judas and think
Jesus is somehow behind the plot. They take hostages and threaten
to execute them unless Jesus is handed over. A now completely
muddled Judas turns Jesus over thinking it'll force his hand and Jesus
will, at last, take power.
Despite the rather money and political-driven plot line, I thought
these characters were rendered as very human with their family
concerns, romantic entanglements, etc. The overall impression I
got from this was how intertwined everything and everyone is.
Yet money is a big theme through out. Both the Romans and Judas
see the vital importance of the merchants. The Romans try to
force the merchants to blacklist Jesus and Co. Judas, in turn,
tries to win their support. Reconciling with his father (a
merchant), Judas arranges for him to get the merchants to support
Jesus. However, no sooner is this agreement made than Jesus
storms through the Temple, overturning tables. And shortly after
that display of anti-consumerism, Jesus gets anointed with super
expensive oil as Judas looks on in dismay. You can kinda
understand why Judas starts to crack up.
Just come random thoughts:
First, if I ever make a Jesus movie, I'm dressing my Jesus in something
other than white robes. Just because I somehow doubt that Jesus
only ever wore white.
Second, if I had the crown of thorns and robe scene in my film and a
character said the robe was purple... I would make it purple. Not
red. It makes me think there's something wrong with my TV.
Third, while I think the whole hostage thing but have involved taking
excessive liberty with the story, there was something stirring about
seeing the hostages freed as Jesus is on the way to Golgotha. It
was like a literal interpretation of his freeing everyone with his
death.
Fourth, at one point Peter assures Judas that "one day we will
understand him [Jesus]." I couldn't help but think that it's been
2,000 years and some of us are still arguing about what Jesus
meant. But I agree with Peter... one day we will understand.
Awards
I like that the people look at least closer to Middle Eastern than they
do in most Jesus films. Glancing at the credits, I'd say the bulk
of the cast was Italian (not surprising for an Italian film) so not
truly accurate casting but, again, less WASPy than usual.
This movie drips with irony. There's the tragic irony of Judas,
early on in the film, uttering the sentence "Take my life. You
won't take the Messiah," to a Roman soldier. We know, of course,
that Jesus will be killed by the Romans (with the help of Judas) and
that Judas will then take his own life. Later, Judas emphatically
tells Rachel that he cannot betray Jesus by taking the 30 pieces of
silver from the community money. Yet he does... And Rachel
betrays Judas. Finally, Judas betrays Jesus by taking the money
thinking he's saving Disma. However, that act then leads to
Disma's real arrest. And who is the criminal crucified alongside
Jesus in this film? Disma. The whole thing kinda seems like
a Shakespearean tragedy.
I think this film does the best job of fleshing Judas out. I
still prefer JCS just because of its style but my heart definitely goes
out to Judas at parts during this. And I think that's a much more
compelling story arc to explore than just "He was a selfish,
power-hungry villain." The part where Judas goes back to his
family home and remarks that "every thing's just the same" in his room
was really touching, as was his cuddling up to his dying mom.
Which leads me to...
Judas' mom is my favorite non-Biblical character in this. There's
a part where she and Judas are talking and Judas remarks that lately
Jesus has gotten things totally wrong. His mother says "maybe he
sees things you cannot see." So we have the follower of Jesus
distrusting him and the non-follower better seeing Jesus' plan.
I'm not so sure that doesn't happen with some regularity today, too.
There are a couple shots of the cross taken from the ground with the
sun behind Jesus that are pretty dramatic and stirring, IMO.
I think this is the most depressing ending to a Jesus movie, at least
that I've seen. There is no resurrection scene, the last we see
of Jesus is dead on the cross. But it doesn't start or stop
there... This whole time Judas has gone completely
delusional. He grins through the trail (still believing the
people will support Jesus) the scourging, Way of the Cross, and through
the crucifixion. Peter even comes to Judas and tells him Jesus
will die but Judas keeps on. He believes the whole time that he's
merely forced Jesus' hand and that Jesus will rescue himself and Disma
and come to power. He even tells Rachel that Jesus can't
die... She insists that he's mad and needs to ask Jesus'
forgiveness before it's too late. Judas remains steadfast in his
belief that all will be will. And then Jesus dies.
Judas runs away with Peter (who was also at Golgotha in this version)
trailing him. Peter keeps screaming for him. But Judas
kills himself just as Peter reaches the tree. So Peter not only
witnesses the suicide right after witnessing Jesus' execution but also
misses the chance to intervene by mere seconds. He clings to
Judas' body and that, except for a view of three empty crosses, is
it. It's not exactly the most uplifting of the Jesus films.
Random Questions
I'm a little shaky on how Judas goes from thinking
Jesus has betrayed their hopes to, again, believing whole-heartedly
that Jesus will save them all. At points it was like sane Judas
started to surface and then would be taken over by deluded Judas.
Like when he was smiling as Jesus was carrying the cross then stops,
starts screaming Jesus' name, falls to his knees, and asks God to send
an angel to free Jesus. For a moment he seems to grasp the
reality of the situation but then at Golgotha is right back to thinking
all will be well. Is this an accurate portrayal of someone losing
their mind? I dunno. It made for interesting viewing, at
least.
The
Nativity Story (2006)
Jesus pretty much just gets a cameo
in this movie... obviously. Nonetheless, it's becoming one of my
favorite Jesus movies. Of course, this is only my second
viewing. I watched it for the first time this past Christmas Day
and then wanted to watch it again sometime before the Christmas season
ended. That didn't happen! So here I am watching it on
Valentine's Day. I thought that seemed weird but, watching it
again, it actually seems really appropriate. Joseph and Mary are
a really inspiring, moving couple.
Plot-wise, the film starts with the Massacre of the Infants and then
flashes back to Zechariah learning of John's pending birth. Then
we meet Mary, her family, and the town of Nazareth. The movie is
very attentive to the struggles of its characters: poverty,
powerlessness, and a brutal leader (Herod). It doesn't take long
for it to become apparent that it's a very, very scary time. The
scene of Mary's young friend being torn from her mother as payment for
taxes due is heartbreaking. Honestly, at parts this movie is way
more difficult for me to watch than Passion of the Christ.
While Jesus' crucifixion was horrible and makes for gut-wrenching
viewing... He chose it. There was a purpose. But it's hard
to see much purpose in murdered babies or enslaved young girls.
Not to mention all the other crucifixions we glimpse in this film.
Yet, this is NOT a depressing movie. Nor is it a movie that makes
everyone pale next to Mary. There are so many rich portrayals in
this film. Mary's parents, Elizabeth, and Zechariah are all very
nuanced, I feel. And I really like that Gabriel looks like a
Nazarene and not the usual, polished, fair angel stereotype. And
the magi! I'm glad they were in this because they lent some much
needed humor to the film. I especially like when Balthasar
laments leaving behind the comforts of home. I also get a kick
out of the two magi assuring themselves they don't miss the third when
it's pretty obvious they do... and then he shows up! And then
there's Joseph... more on him later.
From there, the plot's in the Bible. The angel visits Mary, Mary
visits Elizabeth, she returns and the village is scandalized, Joseph
has a dream, the census is called, they journey to Bethlehem, and Jesus
is born. But the way the movie shows all this... it's beautiful
and profound and somehow exciting even when we know the story.
The socio-economic realism and fleshed-out characters made this movie
for me. As did just random, tiny little things as simple as
Joseph's friend brushing paint from his face when Mary's
approaching. Quirks like that that are just so universally
human! In other Jesus films, I find myself just sorta waiting for
all the Nativity stuff to be over so that the real, dramatic, poignant
story can begin. It's why it took me well over 2 years to finally
sit down and watch this. I really didn't think I'd much like
it. But in this movie, the Nativity *is* real and dramatic and
tear-inducingly poignant.
Awards
I'm gonna hand this one the Best Joseph award. Well, assumedly
that would go to the real Joseph but for fictional Josephs... I'm
giving it to this guy. He had me at buying back Joachim's donkey
and telling Mary to say it was left behind in order to save the man's
pride. Not only that but... they were going to kill the
donkey! So Joseph saved him and Mary's family and it was
awesome. And then later when he gives Mary most of their last bit
of bread and then shares his lil portion with the donkey...
seriously. I know I'm Catholic and we have the whole perpetual
virginity of Mary thing but... if Joseph was really like that then I
really hope his descendants are still around. And I really can't
seem to get myself worked up into a tizzy thinking they could be
Mary's, too.
All that being said, Joseph wasn't depicted as some dreamy, ethereal
paragon. He gets angry. He gets bitter. He's not
initially inclined to take Mary back. But, to me, that made him
more relatable and real. He was prone to heartbreak just like any
of us. He just didn't get bogged down in it, he had faith, and he
had enough love to not care about all the wagging tongues or even his
own pain. One stand out part for me is when he and Mary are
headed to Bethlehem and that woman tells him "To see yourself in a
young face... there is no greater joy." Even though Joseph is
totally behind Mary at this point and knows the child is God's, the
words sting. Joseph wanted his own child. It's a complex
and endearing portrayal.
Finally, I was really struck by Joseph lamenting that the Temple is
"meant to be a holy place." Shades of You Know Who there...
I really, really thought the portrayals of Mary in both Mary, Mother of Jesus and Jesus (1999) were well
done. But I think I'm gonna have to give this Best Mary,
too. And not just because Keisha Castle-Hughes was actually an
appropriate age and look for the part as opposed to the other films'
Marys. I was just really taken in by this Mary. Again, she
seems real. She plays, she gets upset with her parents, she
worries about her betrothal, and she can speak up for herself... and do
it very well. She seems like someone you could know. Even
more like someone you'd look up to but not in a completely distant,
untouchable way. And the look on her face when she first feels
Jesus move in her belly... that's a moment to stick with you.
But I think my favorite aspect of this movie is watching her feelings
about Joseph change. I can honestly say I never gave much thought
to what Mary must have felt about him. But this seems like a good
hypothesis. She's reluctant to wed him. After all, she
barely knows him. It's obvious he's in love with her but it
doesn't follow that she must reciprocate. So she feels the
unfairness of it and voices that. I like thinking she didn't just
unquestioningly accept everything that happened to her... even if she
did have to abide by it.
So I know this is probly just my modern mentality showing but I liked
that the film doesn't set this marriage in front of us and just assume
both parties were thrilled. That's not realistic to me. And
it doesn't inspire much. Instead, we actually get to watch Mary
fall in love with Joseph. We take that emotional journey with
her. And that makes it so touching to realize these are the
people that raised Jesus: people who may not have had the best start
but forged a strong, deep, loving bond.
So we get these sweet little moments where Mary smiles at seeing Joseph
feed and talk to the donkey. Or, my personal favorite, clasping
his hand when the woman's comment about their baby hits him. Or
when she washes his feet and tells the not-yet-born Jesus that he'll
have a good man to raise him. Frankly, I want to believe that
Jesus was raised by two people that loved each other an awful lot and
this movie makes ya think that just might have been how it was.
Best Use of Sarcasm in a Jesus Movie- Joseph deadpanning "They're going
to miss us" as he and a very pregnant Mary depart Nazareth amidst
townspeople giving them the evil eye is just plain fun.
Best Use of Christmas Carols- I like "O Come, O Come Emmanuel" at the
start but "The Carol of the Bells" when Mary's contractions begin gives
me goosebumps.
Best Shepherd- I cry when that fellow is so reluctant to reach out and
touch baby Jesus then finally does at Mary's prompting. That guy
really did deserve an award.
Random Questions
I'd never thought of this before but around Christmas
I was reading a newspaper column about the Gospels. The author
pondered why Zechariah was struck mute for questioning God. Yet,
Mary does the same and is exalted. Why? I mean I actually
like that Mary questioned Gabriel. But the different reactions
the two get does make me wonder. Perhaps it's because God
understood that a young girl was bound to be more frightened and
astounded than an old man... especially when she's going to end up
carrying the Son of God. Pretty astounding and amazing when I
think that, at 14, I could barely handle schoolwork and friends
issues...
(Reviewed 2-14-10)
I think I just need to ramble on
this one. Weirdly, I wound up choosing Godspell for this weekend
after discovering that I still remembered that Victor Garber's birthday
is March 16th. My inner monologue went something like this: "It's
March 16th. I know that's somehow significant but how...
Wait... I think it's Victor Garber's birthday!" And, sure
enough, it was. I can only assume that bit of trivia got lodged
in my brain when I was watching Godspell so often during
high school. So... it only seemed right to watch it this weekend
after that experience.
Godspell is really its
own thing. It's hard to compare it to the other Jesus films
here. There's not really a great deal of character
development. It more glides from parable to parable and song to
song than tells a cohesive story. And yet... I get sucked in
every time emotionally. I believe these people care about each
other. I want to hang out with them! I share in their awe
of the hippie Christ. Watching this movie makes me feel like a
lil kid again... something Jesus valued. There's such joy in
it! How can you not sing along with "Prepare Ye" and "All Good
Gifts" and, really, all of them!?! And yet...
I found with this viewing that the experience has become somewhat
melancholy. Watching Godspell
is like getting a postcard from a simpler time. I miss watching
this and not feeling a pang of grief when I see the Twin Towers.
I miss having no clue what the apostles felt at the end: mourning a
peer, mourning the man who taught them about God.
From "By My Side" on, I was pretty transfixed. And I still feel
this suffocating sensation when they return to the park at the end and
Jesus starts removing their make-up. When Jesus says his "heart
is ready to break with grief"... My God. And watching this I
realized that seeing Jesus die, even just fictionally, has actually
gotten more difficult the more deaths I've experienced. It's
become more real somehow. And yet how much more grateful I've
become... If I didn't believe in Heaven and Him, I think each
death would have taken a lil more of my sanity and I'd be far gone by
now.
There is no resurrection here. But when they start up with the
"Long live Gods"... It's such a beautifully spirited
moment. That it's sung is so poignant, too. I turn to music
so often as a salve for my grief and an expression of happiness.
Yes, He lives. And because of that we can carry on with joy for
the rest of our lives.
I was particularly struck, this time around, by the empty New York
aspect. It's magical, really. For a brief space of time
there are only 10 people in the whole city! It just makes me
think of those perfect moments of connection with people when
everything else seems to dissolve. There is no stress, no
trouble, no job, etc. Only you and them. I was told once
that Godspell isn't
about Jesus at all but about connection and community. I wish I'd
said to them: "And what's the difference?" God is love and He's
there when we truly meet each other with love and compassion.
This movie is about Jesus *and* connecting with each other.
Anyhow, here are awards:
Best Non-standard Costuming- I love Jesus' outfit. Classic.
Victor Garber looks adorable and Superman shirts would never be the
same for me.
Best Dual Role- The John/Judas dual role has always intrigued me.
When does he switch over? Why did they decide to do it that
way? Why not cast two people? It's just interesting to
think about.
Best Nostalgia Trip- I can still remember crystal-clear moments of
watching this when I was a teen: tucked away in bed with pneumonia or
the time I watched it in the evening and a wind struck up just before
Judas betrayed Jesus. I truly loved this film. I still do.
(Reviewed 3-20-11)
The Greatest Story Ever
Told (1965)
I decided I should cover one I had
not yet reviewed here. I know I saw this some years back on TV so
am not sure if this is my first time viewing it uncut or not.
It's over three hours long so I'm breaking it up over the afternoon,
watching approximately an hour in each sitting. So for the first
hour...
I have to be honest and say the first twenty or so minutes are really
boring to me. They are so Herod-centric. You only briefly
see Mary and Joseph. But then they get pretty quickly to Jesus'
adulthood so that's good. Cause outside of The Nativity Story, I just
don't typically find film coverage of Jesus' birth to be that
compelling. Not sure why.
One thing I do like about the beginning is the recitation of John
1. Also cool is how often you hear prayers calling out for the
Messiah. It's particularly stirring when you hear that over Mary,
Joseph, and Jesus returning home... surrounded by crucifixions.
There are a few character moments I really like. Peter's reaction
to his stolen coat actually made me laugh. Dude was not letting
it go! And "Little James" is sweet. I like how he wanted to
follow Jesus just cause he liked what he said then declared Jesus "a
good name." But other than that... I find myself not really
connecting with characters and right when I realized that I also
noticed that this movie is shot a lot with wide shots. There are
times Jesus is speaking and the camera is so far away that you can't
even see his lips moving. I'd like to see his facial expressions!
One thing I will say for this version is that it gives a lot more
coverage to Jesus' teaching than most others. There are moments
that I just don't think a modern movie could pull off in which Jesus
just
sits and talks. Nothing else happens. It's quite
great. But, again, I wish the camera would move in during these
moments rather than staying anchored several feet away.
I did get a lil emotional when Jesus is departing Lazarus' home and
Mary says something like "I fear for him. He's too good."
In the second hour, they hit more scenes that make me emotional
(although the distance shots continue unabated...)
First, the blind man always gets me. And when he's talking to an
absent Jesus about his childhood... Something about that makes me
really sad. I guess because I realize that guy's gonna have to
get used to Jesus' physical absence.
Second, I think it's James (distant shot so can't be sure) who asks
Jesus if men are like ripples in the water... just floating away and
lost. Then he mentions John. You can tell he's sad about
his death (even without visuals). Jesus' only response is to
begin the Our Father. Sometimes that's all one can do in the face
of grief. I've come to understand that. I know some people
are against rote prayers. But sometimes they are all that comes
out.
I do love this version of Lazarus' resurrection. I get goosebumps
when the "Hallelujah Chorus" starts up. There are also plenty of
close-ups in that segment, starting with Jesus' "I Am the resurrection"
and a lot of beautiful reaction shots. And a much happier bit
with the blind man.
Finally, in the third hour...
This movie doesn't do a great job of fleshing Judas out.
Nonetheless, his speech about Jesus' heart and his love for him is
gut-wrenching. Although I've never understood why this film has
him commit suicide by fire.
I love Sidney Poitier as Simon. He doesn't simply carry the cross
but seems to actually carry Jesus. And that single tear at the
end... He never says a word but it's just beautiful. He
looks like an angel.
The crucifixion pretty well verifies for me that sometimes this film
sacrifices emotion for spectacle. The shots of the three crosses
are stirring. But for a long while, that's all you see. I
started to doubt if Mr. Von Sydow was even present for that scene or
just doing voiceover work.
Awards:
Jesus Movie Most Likely to Make You Think Something is Wrong with Your
TV- The first 30 seconds or so are just a black screen with score
music. Fair warning! I was about ready to see if my TV had
died. They do it again at the start of Act II.
Best James- Okay, maybe not. I might be forgetting other really
good James. But, seriously, I like this kid. Maybe cause
he's exactly that: a kid. It's nice to think Jesus had a
happy-go-lucky kid around to cheer him up.
Best Resurrection of Lazarus- Seriously, I really do like this take on
it. It's why I most wanted to rewatch this version. That
and Sidney Poitier.
Best Simon- See above.
Most Untrue Line- One priest tells another "This will all be forgotten
in a week." I am writing this approximately 102,856 weeks
later. :-)
The
Visual Bible:
Matthew (1993)
Since this is so lengthy, I'm going
to do what I did with Greatest
Story and separate my thoughts into hours. So, in the
first hour...
First, I was very glad when other characters started speaking.
There was a moment of panic when I thought it was going to be Richard
Kiley speaking the whole time with the other actors simply moving.
Second, very nice to get a glimpse of Mary's and Joseph's
wedding. Yay them.
Third... I have to say that I think the Massacre of the Infants was
pretty gratuitous. Because of it, I probably would not let my
kid watch this movie which seems a shame. I started to get really
upset and I'm 28. People know what's going on. There's
absolutely no need to show close-ups of dead children.
In general, I like how dynamically Jesus speaks. Gestures, varied
voice, and even a prank (pouring water on an apostle's head). For
Jesus to have maintained the following He did, He must have been a
compelling figure. I can see that in this rendition.
Unfortunately, I find the bouncing back and forth between the scenes of
Jesus' ministry and Matthew's retelling jarring. Richard Kiley is
a fine actor and does his part well. But the set-up is just
really breaking the spell and screaming "This is a film!" to
me.
One of the better things about covering an entire Gospel is that the
resulting film will highlight scenes many others skip over. For
example, the demons-into-swines scene doesn't seem to get much
play. I don't know that I think it's that vital but, still, it's
in the Bible so it's good to see someone show it. What I'm really
glad to see is the centurion with the ill servant. I love that
exchange between him and Jesus and think it gives us all so much to
think about. So I was psyched to see it here.
The second hour brings us the bleeding woman. She's another
person who doesn't often make it into the movies but that story, too, I
have a lot of appreciation for. Both she and the centurion show
such faith. In addition, Jesus was really taking a risk by
touching an unclean woman. So it's really a shame that this scene
isn't included more often. At least it's here!
This way of doing things also ensures that the less... palatable scenes
remain, too. It's not easy reading/watching Jesus going off on
the unbelieving towns. It's actually pretty painful. But
they're in the Bible for a reason and so it just may be a very good
thing that at least one film version retains them. They have to
be thought about and dealt with.
Otherwise the second hour didn't really have any stand-out moments for
me. Just some general things: I like how affectionate this Jesus
is. I like how he had the apostles recite lines for a
parable. Maybe Godspell
is more accurate than we know! :-) I was kinda bummed that,
by sticking to the Bible, creativity is kinda limited. This isn't
gonna show us some possible conversation between Jesus and Judas, for
example. But there is still a creative element in how lines are
performed. For example, I was kinda startled when Jesus laughs
after Peter begins to sink after walking on water. In Cotton Patch Gospel this is
portrayed as a terrible disappointment for Jesus. Who's to
say? Maybe He was crushed, maybe He thought His friend freaking
out when, really, there was no danger was just kinda hysterical.
So, yeah, even without newly crafted lines, there's definitely creative
interpretation at work here.
Highlights, for me, from the third hour included the Canaanite woman,
the Transfiguration, and the healing of the young man with
seizures. The first is depicted in the Jeremy Sisto version but
not, to my recollection, in many others. It's such an interesting
scene to me because it shows that Jesus (while sinless) didn't
necessarily know everything when He was here. He could learn,
too. Plus, that woman's faith is just astounding. I am less
emotionally connected to the Transfiguration but it's a very intriguing
element and seldom depicted. Finally, as an epileptic, I
appreciated the scene of the man with seizures. Most films prefer
to focus on the healings of the blind and lame which are, of course,
stirring. The epileptics tend to get forgotten. Not here!
In general, I am really appreciating the look of this version. It
seems the most real to me visually. Nothing yet has looked like a
plaster facade brought in out of storage. It all looks like what
I really imagine Jesus and Co. seeing as they went to Jerusalem,
visited towns, etc. And the scenery is just beautiful.
Also, Bruce Marchiano is probably one of the more realistic looking
Jesuses.
He's not blonde, he has darker skin, and the hair is probably pretty
accurate, too. I've read that Jesus likely did not have the long,
ponytail-ready hair we often associate with Him but actually something
more of what we'd call shaggy. That's what ya get here.
The fourth hour mostly revolves around the walls closing in on
Jesus. This rendition of his speech against the Pharisees is
pretty upsetting to watch. Jesus' agony is depicted very
well. That, coupled with the Massacre scene, made me fear for how
the Crucifixion would be portrayed in this one. I was shocked to
see how bad Jesus' eyes looked after the first beating following his
arrest. That was jarring. But the Crucifixion itself did
not last long. It was meaningful and well done but not
gratuitous.
I am really glad that they let "the other Mary" who sees Jesus after
his
resurrection be his mother. At least I thought she looked
like the same actress. Beyond that, I found this to be a pretty
stirring rendition of the Passion and Resurrection but I suppose I
missed some of the staples from the other Gospels. I think it
would be great if someone did a truly faithful rendition that blended
the Gospel accounts.
Awards:
Not really in an award type of mood but I spose "Best Visuals" and
"Most True to the Book" will do!
Well, that's all the movies
I've
seen as of right now, at least those I've seen enough to write about. I
have loved all these different portrayals of Jesus Christ and think the
actors did wonderful jobs. However, if anyone knows of a version in
which Jesus is portrayed by a man looking like one would think a
Nazarene would look, let me know as I would love to see that version.
Thanks!
Back
Jenni's
Place